Comparison Overview

inCharge Global

VS

CreditEase

inCharge Global

4th Floor, Ghana House Ghana Multimedia Center Accra High Street, Greater Accra AN 16731, GH
Last Update: 2025-11-21

inCharge is an Mobile Financial Services company, providing Mobile Banking, mCommerce, Card products, Loyalty programs, Electronic Banking platforms and an Agent network to support Financial Inclusion and Mobile Money. inCharge is partnered with Ecobank, to develop and offer Financial services to the unbanked. Our portfolio of services include: > Agent Network - Recruitment and Management > Technology platform development for Mobile Banking, Mobile Payments and Mobile Commerce > Bulk Disbursements > Customer loyalty management > Revenue collection inCharge Global offers the last mile to all Corporates, Governments, Multi-Nationals and organizations looking for an easier way to pay and collect from the unbanked public in Africa.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

CreditEase

朝阳区建国路88号SOHO现代城16层, 北京, 北京, undefined, CN
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 2006, CreditEase is a Beijing-based world-leading FinTech conglomerate in China. It specializes in inclusive finance and wealth management with a dominant position in credit technology, wealth management technology, insurance technology, etc. Main business sectors of CreditEase include Yiren Digital, CreditEase Wealth Management and CreditEase Insurance. Better tech, better finance, better world.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 16,982
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/incharge-global.jpeg
inCharge Global
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/creditease.jpeg
CreditEase
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
inCharge Global
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CreditEase
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for inCharge Global in 2025.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CreditEase in 2025.

Incident History — inCharge Global (X = Date, Y = Severity)

inCharge Global cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CreditEase (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CreditEase cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/incharge-global.jpeg
inCharge Global
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/creditease.jpeg
CreditEase
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

CreditEase company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to inCharge Global company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, CreditEase company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to inCharge Global company.

In the current year, CreditEase company and inCharge Global company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither CreditEase company nor inCharge Global company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither CreditEase company nor inCharge Global company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither CreditEase company nor inCharge Global company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither inCharge Global company nor CreditEase company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither inCharge Global nor CreditEase holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither inCharge Global company nor CreditEase company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

CreditEase company employs more people globally than inCharge Global company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither inCharge Global nor CreditEase holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither inCharge Global nor CreditEase holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither inCharge Global nor CreditEase holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither inCharge Global nor CreditEase holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither inCharge Global nor CreditEase holds HIPAA certification.

Neither inCharge Global nor CreditEase holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H