Comparison Overview

inCharge Global

VS

Aditya Birla Capital

inCharge Global

4th Floor, Ghana House Ghana Multimedia Center Accra High Street, Greater Accra AN 16731, GH
Last Update: 2025-11-21

inCharge is an Mobile Financial Services company, providing Mobile Banking, mCommerce, Card products, Loyalty programs, Electronic Banking platforms and an Agent network to support Financial Inclusion and Mobile Money. inCharge is partnered with Ecobank, to develop and offer Financial services to the unbanked. Our portfolio of services include: > Agent Network - Recruitment and Management > Technology platform development for Mobile Banking, Mobile Payments and Mobile Commerce > Bulk Disbursements > Customer loyalty management > Revenue collection inCharge Global offers the last mile to all Corporates, Governments, Multi-Nationals and organizations looking for an easier way to pay and collect from the unbanked public in Africa.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Aditya Birla Capital

One World Center, Tower 1, 18th Floor, Jupiter Mills Compound, 841, Senapati Bapat Marg, Elphinstone Road, Mumbai, undefined, 400013, IN
Last Update: 2025-11-26

Aditya Birla Capital Ltd is a financial services company based out of One World Center, Tower 1, 18th Floor, Jupiter Mills Compound, 841, Senapati Bapat Marg, Elphinstone Road, MUMBAI, India. - Aditya Birla Capital is committed to provide equal opportunity to all in employment and prohibits discrimination or harassment in any form on the basis of race, colour, religion, ethnicity, age, gender, disability or any other characteristic protected by law. Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) is embedded in our recruitment policies based on our business needs and candidates meeting the eligibility criteria such as qualification, skills and experience.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 22,214
Subsidiaries: 18
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/incharge-global.jpeg
inCharge Global
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aditya-birla-capital.jpeg
Aditya Birla Capital
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
inCharge Global
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Aditya Birla Capital
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for inCharge Global in 2025.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Aditya Birla Capital in 2025.

Incident History — inCharge Global (X = Date, Y = Severity)

inCharge Global cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Aditya Birla Capital (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aditya Birla Capital cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/incharge-global.jpeg
inCharge Global
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aditya-birla-capital.jpeg
Aditya Birla Capital
Incidents

Date Detected: 01/2022
Type:Cyber Attack
Motivation: Data Theft
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Aditya Birla Capital company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to inCharge Global company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Aditya Birla Capital company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas inCharge Global company has not reported any.

In the current year, Aditya Birla Capital company and inCharge Global company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Aditya Birla Capital company nor inCharge Global company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Aditya Birla Capital company nor inCharge Global company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Aditya Birla Capital company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while inCharge Global company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither inCharge Global company nor Aditya Birla Capital company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither inCharge Global nor Aditya Birla Capital holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Aditya Birla Capital company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to inCharge Global company.

Aditya Birla Capital company employs more people globally than inCharge Global company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither inCharge Global nor Aditya Birla Capital holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither inCharge Global nor Aditya Birla Capital holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither inCharge Global nor Aditya Birla Capital holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither inCharge Global nor Aditya Birla Capital holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither inCharge Global nor Aditya Birla Capital holds HIPAA certification.

Neither inCharge Global nor Aditya Birla Capital holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H