Comparison Overview

In-N-Out Burger

VS

Red Lobster

In-N-Out Burger

4199 Campus Drive, Irvine, CA, 92612, US
Last Update: 2025-12-20
Between 750 and 799

In-N-Out Burger was founded in 1948 by Harry and Esther Snyder in Baldwin Park, California, and remains privately owned and operated. Under the direction of the Snyder family, the company has opened restaurants throughout California, Nevada, Arizona, Utah, Texas, Oregon, Colorado, and Idaho. In-N-Out Burger’s menu has remained the same since 1948, and we have maintained a simple philosophy – serve only the highest quality product, prepare it in a clean and sparkling environment, and serve it in a warm and friendly manner. We have built a reputation for fresh, made-to-order foods prepared and served by friendly, well trained Associates.

NAICS: 7225
NAICS Definition: Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees: 11,515
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Red Lobster

450 S Orange Ave, Orlando, Florida, 32801, US
Last Update: 2025-12-18
Between 750 and 799

With 58,000 employees and more than 700 restaurants in the United States and Canada, and a growing international presence, Red Lobster is the world’s largest seafood restaurant company. Our vision is to be where the world goes for seafood now and for generations. Red Lobster is an innovative, values-based company that focuses on providing guests the ultimate seafood dining experience and continues to grow by focusing on Great Seafood, Great People and Great Results. Great Seafood - Whether it’s delicious Maine lobster, wild-caught Snow and Bairdi crab, grilled salmon or craveable shrimp scampi, our focus is on delighting guests with freshly prepared, quality seafood every time they visit. Great People - We hire team members and managers with the hospitality gene. Our people are dedicated and passionate about delivering our promise - ultimate seafood dining experience – to guests on every visit. In addition, we are a place where our teams receive the skills and training to pursue their professional dreams. Great Results - At Red Lobster, we are focused on driving business momentum and sustainably growing sales. In addition, we emphasize innovation and quality to ensure we satisfy guests to grow their loyalty and motivate them to return today and in the future. There’s no better time than now to join the team at Red Lobster!

NAICS: 7225
NAICS Definition: Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees: 16,394
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/in-n-out-burger.jpeg
In-N-Out Burger
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/-red-lobster.jpeg
Red Lobster
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
In-N-Out Burger
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Red Lobster
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for In-N-Out Burger in 2025.

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Red Lobster in 2025.

Incident History — In-N-Out Burger (X = Date, Y = Severity)

In-N-Out Burger cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Red Lobster (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Red Lobster cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/in-n-out-burger.jpeg
In-N-Out Burger
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/-red-lobster.jpeg
Red Lobster
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Red Lobster company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to In-N-Out Burger company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Red Lobster company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to In-N-Out Burger company.

In the current year, Red Lobster company and In-N-Out Burger company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Red Lobster company nor In-N-Out Burger company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Red Lobster company nor In-N-Out Burger company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Red Lobster company nor In-N-Out Burger company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither In-N-Out Burger company nor Red Lobster company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither In-N-Out Burger nor Red Lobster holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither In-N-Out Burger company nor Red Lobster company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Red Lobster company employs more people globally than In-N-Out Burger company, reflecting its scale as a Restaurants.

Neither In-N-Out Burger nor Red Lobster holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither In-N-Out Burger nor Red Lobster holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither In-N-Out Burger nor Red Lobster holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither In-N-Out Burger nor Red Lobster holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither In-N-Out Burger nor Red Lobster holds HIPAA certification.

Neither In-N-Out Burger nor Red Lobster holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Marshmallow is a lightweight library for converting complex objects to and from simple Python datatypes. In versions from 3.0.0rc1 to before 3.26.2 and from 4.0.0 to before 4.1.2, Schema.load(data, many=True) is vulnerable to denial of service attacks. A moderately sized request can consume a disproportionate amount of CPU time. This issue has been patched in version 3.26.2 and 4.1.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

KEDA is a Kubernetes-based Event Driven Autoscaling component. Prior to versions 2.17.3 and 2.18.3, an Arbitrary File Read vulnerability has been identified in KEDA, potentially affecting any KEDA resource that uses TriggerAuthentication to configure HashiCorp Vault authentication. The vulnerability stems from an incorrect or insufficient path validation when loading the Service Account Token specified in spec.hashiCorpVault.credential.serviceAccount. An attacker with permissions to create or modify a TriggerAuthentication resource can exfiltrate the content of any file from the node's filesystem (where the KEDA pod resides) by directing the file's content to a server under their control, as part of the Vault authentication request. The potential impact includes the exfiltration of sensitive system information, such as secrets, keys, or the content of files like /etc/passwd. This issue has been patched in versions 2.17.3 and 2.18.3.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Fedify is a TypeScript library for building federated server apps powered by ActivityPub. Prior to versions 1.6.13, 1.7.14, 1.8.15, and 1.9.2, a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability exists in Fedify's document loader. The HTML parsing regex at packages/fedify/src/runtime/docloader.ts:259 contains nested quantifiers that cause catastrophic backtracking when processing maliciously crafted HTML responses. This issue has been patched in versions 1.6.13, 1.7.14, 1.8.15, and 1.9.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Authenticated Remote Code Execution (RCE) in PluXml CMS 5.8.22 allows an attacker with administrator panel access to inject a malicious PHP webshell into a theme file (e.g., home.php).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

An issue was discovered in Xiongmai XM530 IP cameras on firmware V5.00.R02.000807D8.10010.346624.S.ONVIF 21.06. The GetStreamUri exposes RTSP URIs containing hardcoded credentials enabling direct unauthorized video stream access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N