Comparison Overview

In Him Christian Wellness

VS

Daybreak Youth Services

In Him Christian Wellness

635 North 12th Street, Lemoyne, Pennsylvania, 17043, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.inhimchristianwellness.org

In Him Christian Wellness is a nonprofit agency offering faith-based, professional services promoting wellness through counseling, massage, creative arts, drama, nutrition and financial consultation. In Him Christian Wellness has been established in order to give access to wellness services for the under-insured and lower income populations, as well as those who are financially able to pay. We are a faith-based agency. The Christian perspective is foundational to how we care for people. We are an evidence- based practice, whereby interventions are based on what is considered to be best-practice for the issues presented. We focus on wellness. Body, mind and spirit are integrated and interactive aspects of life. Each can significantly influence how a person thinks, feels and behaves. Our mission is to serve Jesus by displaying unconditional love through professional services that promote wellness.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Daybreak Youth Services

960 E 3rd Ave, Spokane, Washington, 99202, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://daybreakyouthservices.org

Daybreak has been successfully treating teens for substance use disorder and mental health challenges since 1978. We are committed to serving teens and their families, and have become an innovative leader in the adolescent mental health and substance abuse treatment field. We provide Inpatient, Outpatient, and Crisis Stabilization services in Eastern and Western Washington. Daybreak serves more than 1,000 youth each year.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 97
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/in-him-christian-wellness.jpeg
In Him Christian Wellness
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/daybreakyouthservices.jpeg
Daybreak Youth Services
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
In Him Christian Wellness
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Daybreak Youth Services
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for In Him Christian Wellness in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Daybreak Youth Services in 2026.

Incident History — In Him Christian Wellness (X = Date, Y = Severity)

In Him Christian Wellness cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Daybreak Youth Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Daybreak Youth Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/in-him-christian-wellness.jpeg
In Him Christian Wellness
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/daybreakyouthservices.jpeg
Daybreak Youth Services
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both In Him Christian Wellness company and Daybreak Youth Services company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Daybreak Youth Services company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to In Him Christian Wellness company.

In the current year, Daybreak Youth Services company and In Him Christian Wellness company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Daybreak Youth Services company nor In Him Christian Wellness company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Daybreak Youth Services company nor In Him Christian Wellness company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Daybreak Youth Services company nor In Him Christian Wellness company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither In Him Christian Wellness company nor Daybreak Youth Services company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither In Him Christian Wellness nor Daybreak Youth Services holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither In Him Christian Wellness company nor Daybreak Youth Services company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Daybreak Youth Services company employs more people globally than In Him Christian Wellness company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither In Him Christian Wellness nor Daybreak Youth Services holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither In Him Christian Wellness nor Daybreak Youth Services holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither In Him Christian Wellness nor Daybreak Youth Services holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither In Him Christian Wellness nor Daybreak Youth Services holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither In Him Christian Wellness nor Daybreak Youth Services holds HIPAA certification.

Neither In Him Christian Wellness nor Daybreak Youth Services holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References