Comparison Overview

Impression 5 Science Center

VS

Cincinnati Observatory

Impression 5 Science Center

200 Museum Drive, LANSING, MI, 48933, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

Impression 5 Science Center is a dynamic, interactive space for families to play, create, and challenge their understanding of science. “Impression 5” refers to the five senses and the way each sense is engaged during your visit to the Science Center! Our mission is to facilitate learners in scientific exploration through hands-on exhibits and participatory educational programming. This hands-on learning environment opened in 1972 and serves over 120,000 families and visitors each year! Now conveniently located in downtown Lansing on Museum Drive and right off Lansing's River Trail, families and students have access to self-led learning opportunities that encourage risk taking, problem solving, and team building. In addition, accessibility is now an Impression 5 priority across the facility, exhibits, and educational programs. Following a full ADA accessibility survey, the building has been renovated to make parking, entrances, and restrooms accessible to individuals with mobility impairments, and the learning spaces—including Impression 5’s exhibit floor and classrooms—are barrier free. Within educational programs, accommodations for physical, developmental, and social needs are planned for and made on a regular basis so that all participants can gain access to personally relevant material and have a successful experience in a group or individual setting.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 29
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Cincinnati Observatory

3489 Observatory Pl, Cincinnati, 45208-2563, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21

The mission of the Cincinnati Observatory Center (the Observatory) will be to maintain the integrity and heritage of a historic 19th century observatory while promoting the study and practice of 21st century astronomy and science. Our vision is to be a primary resource in furthering astronomy and science education through programming: For K-12 schools and the public on and off our campus For universities and classes for teacher professional development To promote the rich history of the Observatory To strengthen our connection to allied STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math) organizations

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/impression-5-science-center.jpeg
Impression 5 Science Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cincinnati-observatory.jpeg
Cincinnati Observatory
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Impression 5 Science Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cincinnati Observatory
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Impression 5 Science Center in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cincinnati Observatory in 2026.

Incident History — Impression 5 Science Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Impression 5 Science Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cincinnati Observatory (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cincinnati Observatory cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/impression-5-science-center.jpeg
Impression 5 Science Center
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cincinnati-observatory.jpeg
Cincinnati Observatory
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Impression 5 Science Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Cincinnati Observatory company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Cincinnati Observatory company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Impression 5 Science Center company.

In the current year, Cincinnati Observatory company and Impression 5 Science Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Cincinnati Observatory company nor Impression 5 Science Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Cincinnati Observatory company nor Impression 5 Science Center company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Cincinnati Observatory company nor Impression 5 Science Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Impression 5 Science Center company nor Cincinnati Observatory company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Impression 5 Science Center nor Cincinnati Observatory holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Impression 5 Science Center company nor Cincinnati Observatory company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Impression 5 Science Center company employs more people globally than Cincinnati Observatory company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Impression 5 Science Center nor Cincinnati Observatory holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Impression 5 Science Center nor Cincinnati Observatory holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Impression 5 Science Center nor Cincinnati Observatory holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Impression 5 Science Center nor Cincinnati Observatory holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Impression 5 Science Center nor Cincinnati Observatory holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Impression 5 Science Center nor Cincinnati Observatory holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.