Comparison Overview

impress Group

VS

BFC Print Network, Inc.

impress Group

Last Update: 2025-12-10
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.impress.biz

impress Group is a globally operating group of companies that develops and manufactures trend-orientated wood-based panel decorative surfaces for the furniture and flooring industry, as well as for the modern interior design industry. The full-service product range contains decorative papers, finish foils, impregnated papers, inks and additives. We create the future-orientated decors for the design of tomorrow directly in-house. Our decors are based on trends which are identified across the globe by our strong network of internal scouts. Being one of the market leaders in the sector, impress provides exceptional trend forecasting for customers all over the world.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 201
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

BFC Print Network, Inc.

455 Commerce Drive, Suite 6, Amherst, 14228, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bfcprintnetwork.com

BFC Print Network, Inc. is a Printing & Promotional Products company serving Western New York clients since 1974. We offer a complete range of services to meet all your printing and promotional needs. We can save you time and effort by attending to every part of the process, from developing the initial concept to distribution. By taking advantage of our extensive network of services, you'll get exactly what you want to most effectively convey your message and represent your business! • COMMERCIAL PRINTING • COMPLETE GRAPHIC DESIGN SERVICE • BUSINESS FORMS • PROMOTIONAL PRODUCTS • CORPORATE APPAREL • DIRECT MAIL SERVICE We offer over 700,000 products to find that perfect item that grabs your customer’s attention. You may also visit us on the web at bfcprintnetwork.com. Our website is there to help you quickly and efficiently search through a portion of those 700,000 products at your convenience. By selecting the “price” and “category” fields, you can search for products that fit your criteria.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/impressdecorgroup.jpeg
impress Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
BFC Print Network, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
impress Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
BFC Print Network, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for impress Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BFC Print Network, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — impress Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

impress Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — BFC Print Network, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BFC Print Network, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/impressdecorgroup.jpeg
impress Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
BFC Print Network, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

BFC Print Network, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to impress Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, BFC Print Network, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to impress Group company.

In the current year, BFC Print Network, Inc. company and impress Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither BFC Print Network, Inc. company nor impress Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither BFC Print Network, Inc. company nor impress Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither BFC Print Network, Inc. company nor impress Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither impress Group company nor BFC Print Network, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither impress Group nor BFC Print Network, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither impress Group company nor BFC Print Network, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

impress Group company employs more people globally than BFC Print Network, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither impress Group nor BFC Print Network, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither impress Group nor BFC Print Network, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither impress Group nor BFC Print Network, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither impress Group nor BFC Print Network, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither impress Group nor BFC Print Network, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither impress Group nor BFC Print Network, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References