Comparison Overview

Impress Print Services

VS

A&M Printing

Impress Print Services

19 Lyon Road, Hersham, Walton-on-Thames, Surrey, KT12 3PU, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Impress provide friendly, expert and outstanding value print and packaging solutions. A powerful communications medium, ever evolving with new ideas and technology. We are committed to harnessing the best of innovation to not only increase efficiency, but to communicate effectively, using original solutions to help our clients stand out from the crowd. Impress is a buzzing place with a friendly and highly skilled team who ensure our clients are looked after every step of the way. You can be sure that whether you require a handful of business cards or invites or several million brochures with secure mailing, your work will be produced to meet our strict range of International ISO control standards for Management, Environment, Quality and Security. We are determined our activities should have a positive effect on the environment around us. Impress is FSC® Certified with the Forest Stewardship Council® and is the first printer in Surrey to be awarded ‘Carbon Balanced Printer’ status supporting the work of the World Land Trust. Impress Print Services are also extremely proud to hold The Royal Warrant of Appointment for printing services to Her Majesty The Queen.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 43
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

A&M Printing

3589 Nevada Street, Pleasanton, CA, 94566, US
Last Update: 2025-12-18
Between 750 and 799

A&M Printing has been servicing print professionals, small to medium size organizations, and fortune 500 companies for more than 20 years. We have spent the last two decades polishing our skills, our knowledge, improving efficiency in production, minimizing our environmental impact, and listening to our customers. As a result, A&M Printing has developed one of the most experienced and dedicated team of professionals in the business today. Our uncompromising customer service will make your entire printing experience with A&M Printing the smoothest and most pleasant you have ever had. Our painstaking attention to details and quality combined with our determination to meet all deadlines make us one of the very few “most reliable printers” in the region. We understand the critical importance of a perfect project delivered on time, every time. Company Philosophy: To produce jobs that will exceed our customers'​ expectations of excellence. Mission Statement: Our customer's success is our success.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/impress-print-services-ltd.jpeg
Impress Print Services
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/a&m-printing.jpeg
A&M Printing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Impress Print Services
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
A&M Printing
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Impress Print Services in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for A&M Printing in 2025.

Incident History — Impress Print Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Impress Print Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — A&M Printing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

A&M Printing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/impress-print-services-ltd.jpeg
Impress Print Services
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/a&m-printing.jpeg
A&M Printing
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

A&M Printing company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Impress Print Services company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, A&M Printing company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Impress Print Services company.

In the current year, A&M Printing company and Impress Print Services company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither A&M Printing company nor Impress Print Services company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither A&M Printing company nor Impress Print Services company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither A&M Printing company nor Impress Print Services company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Impress Print Services company nor A&M Printing company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Impress Print Services nor A&M Printing holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Impress Print Services company nor A&M Printing company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Impress Print Services company employs more people globally than A&M Printing company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Impress Print Services nor A&M Printing holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Impress Print Services nor A&M Printing holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Impress Print Services nor A&M Printing holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Impress Print Services nor A&M Printing holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Impress Print Services nor A&M Printing holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Impress Print Services nor A&M Printing holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N