Comparison Overview

Impress Budva Printing

VS

Crux RoadBoardz Graphics

Impress Budva Printing

Topliški put, Budva, 85310, ME
Last Update: 2025-12-12
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.impres.me

Impress Budva is printing company offering full print services with graphic design in Montenegro and international. We are printing for more than 15 years, and our employees has 7-30 years of experience in graphic arts industries. We combine traditional and new print techniques for best results and fast turnarounds, such as OFFSET printing for high quantities; DIGITAL print for fast delivery; SILKSCREEN print for textile, promomaterial and special effects; DIE CUT for labels, packaging and special cuts, EMBOSSING for special effects; LAMINATION for durability; BOOK BINDING services. Products that we are specialised for: - Brochures - Catalogues - Flyers - Notebooks - Books - Magazines - Labels - Packaging - Restaurant menu - File folders - T-shirt and textile printing - NCR forms and many more...

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Crux RoadBoardz Graphics

3475 Langley Drive, Hebron, 41048, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cruxroadboardz.com

Crux RoadBoardz Graphics has specialized in full-service, custom graphics since 1991. Our full line of services includes vehicle wraps, fleet graphics, custom decals, sign and banners, window graphics, and wall graphics. All design, production, and installation work is done in-house from our location in Greater Cincinnati. We pride ourselves on producing your graphics quickly, inexpensively and correctly – the first time.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/impress-budva-printing.jpeg
Impress Budva Printing
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/crux-roadboardz-graphics.jpeg
Crux RoadBoardz Graphics
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Impress Budva Printing
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Crux RoadBoardz Graphics
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Impress Budva Printing in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Crux RoadBoardz Graphics in 2025.

Incident History — Impress Budva Printing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Impress Budva Printing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Crux RoadBoardz Graphics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Crux RoadBoardz Graphics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/impress-budva-printing.jpeg
Impress Budva Printing
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/crux-roadboardz-graphics.jpeg
Crux RoadBoardz Graphics
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Impress Budva Printing company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Crux RoadBoardz Graphics company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Crux RoadBoardz Graphics company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Impress Budva Printing company.

In the current year, Crux RoadBoardz Graphics company and Impress Budva Printing company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Crux RoadBoardz Graphics company nor Impress Budva Printing company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Crux RoadBoardz Graphics company nor Impress Budva Printing company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Crux RoadBoardz Graphics company nor Impress Budva Printing company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Impress Budva Printing company nor Crux RoadBoardz Graphics company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Impress Budva Printing nor Crux RoadBoardz Graphics holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Impress Budva Printing company nor Crux RoadBoardz Graphics company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Crux RoadBoardz Graphics company employs more people globally than Impress Budva Printing company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Impress Budva Printing nor Crux RoadBoardz Graphics holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Impress Budva Printing nor Crux RoadBoardz Graphics holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Impress Budva Printing nor Crux RoadBoardz Graphics holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Impress Budva Printing nor Crux RoadBoardz Graphics holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Impress Budva Printing nor Crux RoadBoardz Graphics holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Impress Budva Printing nor Crux RoadBoardz Graphics holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References