Comparison Overview

Impresa Legal Group

VS

Venzie Construction Law

Impresa Legal Group

3033 Wilson Blvd, Arlington, US
Last Update: 2025-11-29
Between 750 and 799

The Impresa Legal GroupTM was founded by seasoned legal practitioners with years of experience who share the goal of providing practical legal solutions to the problems our clients face. We have served as: - - Partners in major “AMLAW 50” and international law firms, - - General Counsels and in-house counsels of multi-million dollar, multi-jurisdictional organizations, - - Members of Senior Executive Teams; and - - Directors, Officers, and Advisors to prominent non-profit and community based organizations. Our clients are leaders and innovators in technology, defense, health, infrastructure, development, logistics, security, finance, real estate and services. We provide legal services related to government contracts, grants and cooperative agreements, litigation and dispute resolution, ethics, compliance and governance, regulated industries, and international trade and transactions. Working together and working with clients, we provide legal services with an eye for business objectives and value for money.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Venzie Construction Law

600 Eagleview Blvd, Exton, Pennsylvania, 19341, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Venzie Construction Law concentrates exclusively on providing quality construction law and litigation services to clients in the construction industry from its office in Exton, PA. The firm’s representation spans all types of construction law issues and disputes in federal and state courts, as well as arbitration and mediation, for owners, construction managers, general contractors, subcontractors, suppliers and sureties. For more information, visit venzielaw.com.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/venzielaw.jpeg
Venzie Construction Law
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Impresa Legal Group
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Venzie Construction Law
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Impresa Legal Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Venzie Construction Law in 2025.

Incident History — Impresa Legal Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Impresa Legal Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Venzie Construction Law (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Venzie Construction Law cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/impresa-legal-group.jpeg
Impresa Legal Group
Incidents
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/venzielaw.jpeg
Venzie Construction Law
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Impresa Legal Group company and Venzie Construction Law company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Venzie Construction Law company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Impresa Legal Group company.

In the current year, Venzie Construction Law company and Impresa Legal Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Venzie Construction Law company nor Impresa Legal Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Venzie Construction Law company nor Impresa Legal Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Venzie Construction Law company nor Impresa Legal Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Impresa Legal Group company nor Venzie Construction Law company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Impresa Legal Group nor Venzie Construction Law holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Impresa Legal Group company nor Venzie Construction Law company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Impresa Legal Group company employs more people globally than Venzie Construction Law company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Impresa Legal Group nor Venzie Construction Law holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Impresa Legal Group nor Venzie Construction Law holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Impresa Legal Group nor Venzie Construction Law holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Impresa Legal Group nor Venzie Construction Law holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Impresa Legal Group nor Venzie Construction Law holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Impresa Legal Group nor Venzie Construction Law holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X