Comparison Overview

Imperial Cafe

VS

Alsea

Imperial Cafe

4650 Corona Dr, Corpus Christi, Texas, 78411, US
Last Update: 2025-03-06 (UTC)

Excellent

Imperial Cafe is a family restaurant located in the heart of Corpus Christi that serves Asian fusion cuisine. Among one of the first sushi restaurants in the Coastal Bend, the family-owned restaurant continues to strive toward proving the best dining experience. Along with the sushi selection, Imperial offers signature Thai dishes as well.

NAICS: 722
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 29
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Alsea

Avenida Revolución n.° 1267, Col. Los Alpes Ciudad de México, Álvaro Obregón 01040, MX
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000

Alsea es el operador de restaurantes líder en América Latina y Europa, con marcas de reconocimiento global dentro de los segmentos de Comida rápida, Cafeterías y Restaurantes de servicio completo. ¡Nos distinguimos por nuestra entrega, pasión por los resultados y por ser una compañía auténtica y divertida! Somos la suma de experiencias únicas y espacios para ser felices; contando con un portafolio multi-marcas integrado por: Domino’s Pizza, Starbucks, Burger King, Chili’s, P. F. Chang’s, Italianni's, The Cheesecake Factory, Vips, Archies, Foster’s Hollywood, Ginos y TGI Fridays. Operamos más de 4,680 unidades a nivel global. ¡Entregamos felicidad y experiencias llenas de sabor!

NAICS: 7225
NAICS Definition: Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees: 10,001+
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/imperial-cafe.jpeg
Imperial Cafe
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC 2
Not verified
GDPR
No public badge
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alsea.jpeg
Alsea
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC 2
Not verified
GDPR
No public badge
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Imperial Cafe
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Alsea
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Imperial Cafe in 2025.

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Alsea in 2025.

Incident History — Imperial Cafe (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Imperial Cafe cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Alsea (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Alsea cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/imperial-cafe.jpeg
Imperial Cafe
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alsea.jpeg
Alsea
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Imperial Cafe company and Alsea company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Alsea company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Imperial Cafe company.

In the current year, Alsea company and Imperial Cafe company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Alsea company nor Imperial Cafe company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Alsea company nor Imperial Cafe company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Alsea company nor Imperial Cafe company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Imperial Cafe company nor Alsea company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Imperial Cafe company nor Alsea company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Imperial Cafe company employs more people globally than Alsea company, reflecting its scale as a Restaurants.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Formbricks is an open source qualtrics alternative. Prior to version 4.0.1, Formbricks is missing JWT signature verification. This vulnerability stems from a token validation routine that only decodes JWTs (jwt.decode) without verifying their signatures. Both the email verification token login path and the password reset server action use the same validator, which does not check the token’s signature, expiration, issuer, or audience. If an attacker learns the victim’s actual user.id, they can craft an arbitrary JWT with an alg: "none" header and use it to authenticate and reset the victim’s password. This issue has been patched in version 4.0.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

Apollo Studio Embeddable Explorer & Embeddable Sandbox are website embeddable software solutions from Apollo GraphQL. Prior to Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3, a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was identified. The vulnerability arises from missing origin validation in the client-side code that handles window.postMessage events. A malicious website can send forged messages to the embedding page, causing the victim’s browser to execute arbitrary GraphQL queries or mutations against their GraphQL server while authenticated with the victim’s cookies. This issue has been patched in Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /consulta-dispensas. Such manipulation leads to improper authorization. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A weakness has been identified in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. Affected is an unknown function of the file /module/Api/aluno. This manipulation of the argument aluno_id causes improper authorization. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in Tencent WeKnora 0.1.0. This impacts the function testEmbeddingModel of the file /api/v1/initialization/embedding/test. The manipulation of the argument baseUrl results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component. The vendor responds: "We have confirmed that the issue mentioned in the report does not exist in the latest releases".

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X