Comparison Overview

Impact Label Corporation

VS

The Bureau

Impact Label Corporation

8875 Krum Ave, Galesburg, Michigan, 49053, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.impactlabel.com

Impact Label Corporation, a certified woman-owned small business, has specialized in product identification items for the past 52 years. Quality in craftsmanship and durable product performance are a couple of the reasons that Fortune 500 companies have come to rely on Impact Label. Our diverse array of innovative products and services allow us to be a single-source partner for many of our clients. Please visit us at www.impactlabel.com for further information on our products and capabilities.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

The Bureau

3400 Technology Drive, Minneapolis, MN, 55418, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.thebureau.com

At The Bureau, we stand ready to meet your increased demands of both service and quality. Our goal remains one of providing you with the best possible product to guarantee that your advertising dollar is well placed with us. Our efforts of continuous improvement in technology, procedures and most importantly our people will assure our ongoing success in accomplishing these goals. Take a look around our website and see how our people, process and technology are enabling our customers to get more out of their print.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 51
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/impact-label-corporation.jpeg
Impact Label Corporation
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-bureau.jpeg
The Bureau
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Impact Label Corporation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Bureau
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Impact Label Corporation in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Bureau in 2025.

Incident History — Impact Label Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Impact Label Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Bureau (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Bureau cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/impact-label-corporation.jpeg
Impact Label Corporation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-bureau.jpeg
The Bureau
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Impact Label Corporation company and The Bureau company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, The Bureau company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Impact Label Corporation company.

In the current year, The Bureau company and Impact Label Corporation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Bureau company nor Impact Label Corporation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Bureau company nor Impact Label Corporation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Bureau company nor Impact Label Corporation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Impact Label Corporation company nor The Bureau company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Impact Label Corporation nor The Bureau holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Impact Label Corporation company nor The Bureau company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Bureau company employs more people globally than Impact Label Corporation company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Impact Label Corporation nor The Bureau holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Impact Label Corporation nor The Bureau holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Impact Label Corporation nor The Bureau holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Impact Label Corporation nor The Bureau holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Impact Label Corporation nor The Bureau holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Impact Label Corporation nor The Bureau holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References