Comparison Overview

Impact Label Corporation

VS

Integrated Web Finishing Systems

Impact Label Corporation

8875 Krum Ave, Galesburg, Michigan, 49053, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.impactlabel.com

Impact Label Corporation, a certified woman-owned small business, has specialized in product identification items for the past 52 years. Quality in craftsmanship and durable product performance are a couple of the reasons that Fortune 500 companies have come to rely on Impact Label. Our diverse array of innovative products and services allow us to be a single-source partner for many of our clients. Please visit us at www.impactlabel.com for further information on our products and capabilities.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Integrated Web Finishing Systems

175 Bodwell Street, Avon, Massachusetts 02322, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.iwebus.com

i-Web designs and builds inline and offline web finishing systems for the production of direct mail, digital advertising, and printing production. All of our systems incorporate advanced servo driven technology. i-Web can integrate rewinders, register splicers, high-tech register systems, video inspection systems, high speed label applicators and ink jet/personalization to deliver some of the most sophisticated Finishing Systems in the business. Integrated Web Finishing Systems is the industry leader in providing products and services to match all of your finishing needs for any printing project.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/impact-label-corporation.jpeg
Impact Label Corporation
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/integrated-web-finishing-systems.jpeg
Integrated Web Finishing Systems
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Impact Label Corporation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Integrated Web Finishing Systems
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Impact Label Corporation in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Integrated Web Finishing Systems in 2025.

Incident History — Impact Label Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Impact Label Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Integrated Web Finishing Systems (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Integrated Web Finishing Systems cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/impact-label-corporation.jpeg
Impact Label Corporation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/integrated-web-finishing-systems.jpeg
Integrated Web Finishing Systems
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Impact Label Corporation company and Integrated Web Finishing Systems company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Integrated Web Finishing Systems company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Impact Label Corporation company.

In the current year, Integrated Web Finishing Systems company and Impact Label Corporation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Integrated Web Finishing Systems company nor Impact Label Corporation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Integrated Web Finishing Systems company nor Impact Label Corporation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Integrated Web Finishing Systems company nor Impact Label Corporation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Impact Label Corporation company nor Integrated Web Finishing Systems company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Impact Label Corporation nor Integrated Web Finishing Systems holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Impact Label Corporation company nor Integrated Web Finishing Systems company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Impact Label Corporation company employs more people globally than Integrated Web Finishing Systems company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Impact Label Corporation nor Integrated Web Finishing Systems holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Impact Label Corporation nor Integrated Web Finishing Systems holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Impact Label Corporation nor Integrated Web Finishing Systems holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Impact Label Corporation nor Integrated Web Finishing Systems holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Impact Label Corporation nor Integrated Web Finishing Systems holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Impact Label Corporation nor Integrated Web Finishing Systems holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References