Comparison Overview

Impact Prints

VS

3d Bindery

Impact Prints

C-190, Vivek Vihar,, Delhi, Delhi, 110095, IN
Last Update: 2025-12-11

Impact Decor operates in India offering a broad range of printing including decor paper, digital laminates, wallpaper, vinyl, backlit fabric & many more. Impact Decor India is one of the most progressive and innovative print companies, focussing on the business needs of the market. The Company’s state-of-art printing setup and ancillary equipment is based at Greater Noida with the head office in New Delhi. The company’s full-colour print comes with a ‘guaranteed’ turnaround time and is available from its network of over 22 dedicated partners spread out across the country.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

3d Bindery

2702 Pemberton Drive, Apopka, Florida 32703, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

3d Bindery is a successful trade bindery producing everything from soft cover books, to magazines, catalogs, yearbooks and other publications. Perfect binding is available in quantities from a single book to hundreds of thousands with quick turnarounds. We utilize both PUR adhesive and standard EVA glue. Equipment List: Muller Martini Pantera PUR Perfect Binding Line - 12 Pocket Signature/Single Sheet Collator Muller Martini Esprit 3 Knife Trimmer (In Line) Horauf SN140 Three Knife Trimmer ProLam PBS6101 Perfect Binder (x3) Foil Express Digital Foil Printer (x2) Challenge CRT305 - 30.5"​ Paper Cutter (x2) ProLam EBC1200 Single Side Laminator (x2) Ledco Educator 25"​ Laminator (x2) USI Digital 25"​ Laminator Morgana Auto Creaser MK-2 PDI Rhino-Tuff HD6500 Punch (x5) DocuPunch +Plus - High Speed Coil/Wire Punch GBC Velobind III Punch/Bind PVC Marlon 350 Auto Crimper (x2) MAC & PC Platforms 3d Bindery is also an approved vendor of bindery supplies, such as coil, wire, comb, lamination film and much more. Contact us for our price catalog and any other questions.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/impact-decor.jpeg
Impact Prints
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/3d-bindery.jpeg
3d Bindery
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Impact Prints
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
3d Bindery
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Impact Prints in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 3d Bindery in 2025.

Incident History — Impact Prints (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Impact Prints cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — 3d Bindery (X = Date, Y = Severity)

3d Bindery cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/impact-decor.jpeg
Impact Prints
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/3d-bindery.jpeg
3d Bindery
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Impact Prints company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to 3d Bindery company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, 3d Bindery company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Impact Prints company.

In the current year, 3d Bindery company and Impact Prints company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither 3d Bindery company nor Impact Prints company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither 3d Bindery company nor Impact Prints company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither 3d Bindery company nor Impact Prints company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Impact Prints company nor 3d Bindery company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Impact Prints nor 3d Bindery holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Impact Prints company nor 3d Bindery company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Impact Prints company employs more people globally than 3d Bindery company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Impact Prints nor 3d Bindery holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Impact Prints nor 3d Bindery holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Impact Prints nor 3d Bindery holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Impact Prints nor 3d Bindery holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Impact Prints nor 3d Bindery holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Impact Prints nor 3d Bindery holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L