Comparison Overview

Imani Treatment Centre

VS

THERA Inc.

Imani Treatment Centre

38 Alexandra Road, Upper Wynberg, 7800, ZA
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Our programme is for adults suffering from a range of eating disorders and behaviours, including anorexia, bulimia, binge eating disorder, emotional eating, body dysmorphic disorder, rumination disorder, and disordered eating resulting from psychotropic medications. Many clients also have co-occurring diagnoses of depression, anxiety, obsessive-compulsive disorder, addiction and other psychological issues that require simultaneous treatment. Imani is one of the only treatment programmes that offer a complete range of holistic care for all stages of recovery. Our hands-on dietary programme includes individualised meal planning and preparation, restaurant and grocery store outings, as well as kitchen skills and nutrition groups. In addition to group work, each client receives individual sessions with our psychiatrist, physician, dietician, case manager and their primary therapist. The Imani team also strives to keep external professionals and families involved every step of the way and considers this vital to our programme’s success. Families have numerous opportunities to participate in their loved ones’ treatment including family therapy, visitation, and therapeutic family meals.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

THERA Inc.

Apt. 524 5855 Horton Street, Emeryville, CA, 94608, US, Emeryville, CA, US, 94608
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

THERA Inc. provides traditional therapy using virtual reality. THERA is an opportunity for therapists to create their own virtual offices, create scheduling and book sessions for individual clients in a HIPPA compliant environment. Additionally, THERA provides clients the opportunity to select their therapist from a directory and customize their avatar therapist. The client can also customize their own avatar to maintain anonymous.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/imani-treatment-centre.jpeg
Imani Treatment Centre
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thera-inc.jpeg
THERA Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Imani Treatment Centre
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
THERA Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Imani Treatment Centre in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for THERA Inc. in 2026.

Incident History — Imani Treatment Centre (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Imani Treatment Centre cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — THERA Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

THERA Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/imani-treatment-centre.jpeg
Imani Treatment Centre
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thera-inc.jpeg
THERA Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Imani Treatment Centre company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to THERA Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, THERA Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Imani Treatment Centre company.

In the current year, THERA Inc. company and Imani Treatment Centre company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither THERA Inc. company nor Imani Treatment Centre company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither THERA Inc. company nor Imani Treatment Centre company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither THERA Inc. company nor Imani Treatment Centre company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Imani Treatment Centre company nor THERA Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Imani Treatment Centre nor THERA Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Imani Treatment Centre company nor THERA Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Imani Treatment Centre company employs more people globally than THERA Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Imani Treatment Centre nor THERA Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Imani Treatment Centre nor THERA Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Imani Treatment Centre nor THERA Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Imani Treatment Centre nor THERA Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Imani Treatment Centre nor THERA Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Imani Treatment Centre nor THERA Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N