Comparison Overview

Imago Clinica

VS

Suicide Prevention Australia

Imago Clinica

Pintor Ribera 20, Bajo A, Madrid, 28016, ES
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://http://www.imagoclinica.com/

Imago Clínica Psicoanalítica desarrolla actividad clínica, de investigación y de formación de psicoterapeutas de orientación psicoanalítica, coordinada por los doctores Nicolás Caparrós e Isabel Sanfeliu, miembros de Espace Analytique. Como clínica, Imago desarrolla una tarea de atención psicoterapéutica individual y grupal, con adultos y niños. Forma también psicoterapeutas de orientación psicoanalítica, siendo Instituto de Formación de SEGPA (Sociedad para el Desarrollo del Grupo, el Psicoanálisis y la Psicoterapia), sociedad miembro de la FEAP (Federación Española de Asociaciones de Psicoterapeutas), quien reconoce como acreditada la formación impartida en este centro. En cuanto a su labor investigadora está recogida en numerosas obras publicadas y en la revista Clínica y Análisis Grupal fundada en 1976.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Suicide Prevention Australia

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, AU
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://suicidepreventionaust.org/

We're the peak body for suicide prevention in Australia. We support, collaborate and advocate for a meaningful reduction in suicide. Join us. Become a Suicide Prevention Australia member. ~ Feel supported in your work and help us build a stronger suicide prevention sector in Australia. ~ Develop collaborative partnerships to raise community awareness and undertake public education on the issues relating to suicide and suicide prevention. ~ Empower us to advocate on your behalf for a better policy and funding environment for suicide prevention. Let's work together towards our shared vision of a world without suicide.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 74
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/imago-clinica.jpeg
Imago Clinica
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/suicide-prevention-australia.jpeg
Suicide Prevention Australia
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Imago Clinica
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Suicide Prevention Australia
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Imago Clinica in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Suicide Prevention Australia in 2026.

Incident History — Imago Clinica (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Imago Clinica cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Suicide Prevention Australia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Suicide Prevention Australia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/imago-clinica.jpeg
Imago Clinica
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/suicide-prevention-australia.jpeg
Suicide Prevention Australia
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Suicide Prevention Australia company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Imago Clinica company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Suicide Prevention Australia company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Imago Clinica company.

In the current year, Suicide Prevention Australia company and Imago Clinica company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Suicide Prevention Australia company nor Imago Clinica company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Suicide Prevention Australia company nor Imago Clinica company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Suicide Prevention Australia company nor Imago Clinica company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Imago Clinica company nor Suicide Prevention Australia company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Imago Clinica nor Suicide Prevention Australia holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Imago Clinica company nor Suicide Prevention Australia company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Suicide Prevention Australia company employs more people globally than Imago Clinica company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Imago Clinica nor Suicide Prevention Australia holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Imago Clinica nor Suicide Prevention Australia holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Imago Clinica nor Suicide Prevention Australia holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Imago Clinica nor Suicide Prevention Australia holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Imago Clinica nor Suicide Prevention Australia holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Imago Clinica nor Suicide Prevention Australia holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References