Comparison Overview

IMAGERS

VS

Qualprint

IMAGERS

1575 Northside Drive, Atlanta, GA, 30318, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

IMAGERS, a PHASE:3 company, is a full service Print & Brand Communication company. Founded in 1947, IMAGERS is a leader in quality, technology, and service for design, print, and brand communication. Our experience, expertise, and innovation in the digital era date back to the 1980’s when we pioneered advances in digital printing, large format printing, and e-commerce ordering and fulfillment. Our mission is to provide the highest quality and timely execution for our clients, by continuously researching new technological innovations, and services, that can benefit our customers. We have six areas of expertise: Print, Environmental Graphics, Exhibit Displays, Promotional Products & Apparel, Design, and E-Commerce ordering.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Qualprint

3 Federico Drive, Pittsfield, 01201, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

While still guided by family values and led by the third generation, Quality Printing, now known as Qualprint, has become an internationally recognized, award-winning business serving the print needs of customers globally. At Qualprint, we deliver high-quality craftsmanship, exemplary service and fast turnaround. We call it the “Qualprint Experience”. As a boutique printer we collaborate with designers, agencies and our customers to guide them in their design – we show them how to add embossing, foil, finishing, specialty paper and so much more. We keep everything in house to ensure premium quality printed goods, and an unwavering attention to detail, that is rarely achieved in the printing industry.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/imagers.jpeg
IMAGERS
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/qualprint.jpeg
Qualprint
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
IMAGERS
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Qualprint
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IMAGERS in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Qualprint in 2025.

Incident History — IMAGERS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IMAGERS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Qualprint (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Qualprint cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/imagers.jpeg
IMAGERS
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/qualprint.jpeg
Qualprint
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Qualprint company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to IMAGERS company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Qualprint company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to IMAGERS company.

In the current year, Qualprint company and IMAGERS company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Qualprint company nor IMAGERS company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Qualprint company nor IMAGERS company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Qualprint company nor IMAGERS company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither IMAGERS company nor Qualprint company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither IMAGERS nor Qualprint holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither IMAGERS company nor Qualprint company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Qualprint company employs more people globally than IMAGERS company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither IMAGERS nor Qualprint holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither IMAGERS nor Qualprint holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither IMAGERS nor Qualprint holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither IMAGERS nor Qualprint holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither IMAGERS nor Qualprint holds HIPAA certification.

Neither IMAGERS nor Qualprint holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N