Comparison Overview

Imageflow Services, Inc.

VS

Afinia Label

Imageflow Services, Inc.

5555 Oakbrook Parkway, Norcross, Georgia, 30093, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

Imageflow loves being the go-to print and promotionals vendor for many Atlanta companies. We have been providing thoughtful service to our local and national clients since 1999. Our goal and our promise is to provide quality marketing materials that you will be proud to distribute. The staff at Imageflow is well versed in a wide array of printing and embellishing techniques. Let us guide you through the process of producing attractive marketing materials that are also cost effective and delivered in a timely manner. It's time to promote your brand! Let us help you.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Afinia Label

8150 Mallory Court, Chanhassen, MN, 55317, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Businesses across the globe are saving time and money while improving their labeling processes. We have built a reputation for providing quality products that make label printing and finishing easier and more dependable than ever, while never losing focus on your number one overall concern: solid return on investment. Whether you are outsourcing your labels or are an experienced label printer or converter, Afinia Label has a wide variety of in-house professional and industrial label printing and finishing solutions to suit your needs.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 33
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/imageflow-services-inc-.jpeg
Imageflow Services, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/afinia.jpeg
Afinia Label
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Imageflow Services, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Afinia Label
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Imageflow Services, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Afinia Label in 2025.

Incident History — Imageflow Services, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Imageflow Services, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Afinia Label (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Afinia Label cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/imageflow-services-inc-.jpeg
Imageflow Services, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/afinia.jpeg
Afinia Label
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Afinia Label company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Imageflow Services, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Afinia Label company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Imageflow Services, Inc. company.

In the current year, Afinia Label company and Imageflow Services, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Afinia Label company nor Imageflow Services, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Afinia Label company nor Imageflow Services, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Afinia Label company nor Imageflow Services, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Imageflow Services, Inc. company nor Afinia Label company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Imageflow Services, Inc. nor Afinia Label holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Imageflow Services, Inc. company nor Afinia Label company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Afinia Label company employs more people globally than Imageflow Services, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Imageflow Services, Inc. nor Afinia Label holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Imageflow Services, Inc. nor Afinia Label holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Imageflow Services, Inc. nor Afinia Label holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Imageflow Services, Inc. nor Afinia Label holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Imageflow Services, Inc. nor Afinia Label holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Imageflow Services, Inc. nor Afinia Label holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N