Comparison Overview

Imageco

VS

Cirrus Visual Communication

Imageco

Britannia House, Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS10 2BR, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Since our inception in 2001 , Imageco Visual Imaging have become one the UK’s leading companies for all things project, print and signage. We are focused on sustainability, recently converting our factory to be powered by solar energy and winners of multiple awards for both our projects and efforts to be more sustainable. We specialise in all sectors of large format exhibition, retail print / display and signage work. With extensive industry knowledge allied to our up to date production facility we aim to supply stunning results, on time, first time, every time. Along with our full in house 3d and graphic design, print and finishing services we also have a full nation wide installation team available 24/7/365. We pride ourselves on our hands on approach and attention to detail, no matter what size the project, so why don’t you give us a call and see how we can help improve your Image!

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 29
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Cirrus Visual Communication

601 N Stone Avenue, Tucson, AZ, US, 85705
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799

Cirrus Visual is your Printing, Graphic Design and Promotional Products partner. We’re committed to driving success for our clients with affordable graphic design, printing, and promotional products that deliver results. We're never more than an email or phone call away to help solve your print communication challenges. From creative brainstorming through to delivery, you can rely on Cirrus to provide an unparalleled experience.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/imageco.jpeg
Imageco
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cirrus-visual-communication.jpeg
Cirrus Visual Communication
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Imageco
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cirrus Visual Communication
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Imageco in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cirrus Visual Communication in 2025.

Incident History — Imageco (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Imageco cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cirrus Visual Communication (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cirrus Visual Communication cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/imageco.jpeg
Imageco
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cirrus-visual-communication.jpeg
Cirrus Visual Communication
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Cirrus Visual Communication company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Imageco company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Cirrus Visual Communication company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Imageco company.

In the current year, Cirrus Visual Communication company and Imageco company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Cirrus Visual Communication company nor Imageco company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Cirrus Visual Communication company nor Imageco company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Cirrus Visual Communication company nor Imageco company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Imageco company nor Cirrus Visual Communication company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Imageco nor Cirrus Visual Communication holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Imageco company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Cirrus Visual Communication company.

Imageco company employs more people globally than Cirrus Visual Communication company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Imageco nor Cirrus Visual Communication holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Imageco nor Cirrus Visual Communication holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Imageco nor Cirrus Visual Communication holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Imageco nor Cirrus Visual Communication holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Imageco nor Cirrus Visual Communication holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Imageco nor Cirrus Visual Communication holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L