Comparison Overview

Image Cube | Print & Mail

VS

Alabama Graphics

Image Cube | Print & Mail

15840 Monte St, Sylmar, 91342, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.imagecube.com

Image Cube helps unlock the potential for every business through complete print, display, direct mail and fulfillment services. We proudly offer complete printing services with a focus on digital, commercial, large format and promotional products. We also specialize in direct mailing and fulfillment to help streamline your business needs. Through our dedication to our customers, we are a reliable partner consistently offering quality and creative products to help grow their business. We strive for operational excellence in every corner of the company by employing a dependable and experienced team, whose passion is for providing the highest level of customer service. We constantly strive to implement critical initiatives required to achieve our vision. From concept to creation, make Image Cube your only stop for all your marketing, printing, direct mailing and fulfillment services.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Alabama Graphics

2801 5th Avenue South, Birmingham, AL, 35233, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799
http://www.algraphics.com

As one of the state’s preferred digital printers and document management providers, Alabama Graphics strives to be your one-stop shop for all your printing, signage and document management needs. Equipped with the latest technology, our team is committed to providing customers with high-quality printing solutions as well as a loyal support network of seasoned professionals.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 43
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/image-cube.jpeg
Image Cube | Print & Mail
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alabama-graphics.jpeg
Alabama Graphics
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Image Cube | Print & Mail
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Alabama Graphics
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Image Cube | Print & Mail in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Alabama Graphics in 2025.

Incident History — Image Cube | Print & Mail (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Image Cube | Print & Mail cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Alabama Graphics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Alabama Graphics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/image-cube.jpeg
Image Cube | Print & Mail
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alabama-graphics.jpeg
Alabama Graphics
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Alabama Graphics company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Image Cube | Print & Mail company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Alabama Graphics company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Image Cube | Print & Mail company.

In the current year, Alabama Graphics company and Image Cube | Print & Mail company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Alabama Graphics company nor Image Cube | Print & Mail company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Alabama Graphics company nor Image Cube | Print & Mail company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Alabama Graphics company nor Image Cube | Print & Mail company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Image Cube | Print & Mail company nor Alabama Graphics company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Image Cube | Print & Mail nor Alabama Graphics holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Image Cube | Print & Mail company nor Alabama Graphics company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Alabama Graphics company employs more people globally than Image Cube | Print & Mail company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Image Cube | Print & Mail nor Alabama Graphics holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Image Cube | Print & Mail nor Alabama Graphics holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Image Cube | Print & Mail nor Alabama Graphics holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Image Cube | Print & Mail nor Alabama Graphics holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Image Cube | Print & Mail nor Alabama Graphics holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Image Cube | Print & Mail nor Alabama Graphics holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References