Comparison Overview

Illusory

VS

NetEase

Illusory

1603 Capitol Ave, Cheyenne, 82001, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 700 and 749

Illusory makes it easier to scrape online data and perform automated tasks without getting blocked or detected. Train AI language models, conduct market research, or run mission-critical operations with our powerful, bare metal mobile proxies.

NAICS: 513
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

NetEase

No.599 Wangshang Road, Binjiang District, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN, 310052
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 800 and 849

As a leading internet technology company based in China, NetEase, Inc. (NASDAQ: NTES and HKEX:9999, "NetEase") provides premium online services centered around content creation. With extensive offerings across its expanding gaming ecosystem, NetEase develops and operates some of China's most popular and longest running mobile and PC games. Powered by industry-leading inhouse R&D capabilities in China and globally, NetEase creates superior gaming experiences, inspires players and passionately delivers value for its thriving community worldwide. Beyond games, NetEase service offerings include its majority-controlled subsidiaries Youdao (NYSE:DAO), China's leading technology-focused intelligent learning company, and Cloud Music (HKEX:9899), China's leading online music content community, as well as Yanxuan, NetEase's private label consumer lifestyle brand.

NAICS: 513
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 11,907
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/illusoryio.jpeg
Illusory
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/netease.jpeg
NetEase
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Illusory
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
NetEase
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Average (This Year)

Illusory has 11.11% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NetEase in 2025.

Incident History — Illusory (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Illusory cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — NetEase (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NetEase cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/illusoryio.jpeg
Illusory
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Exploitation of a software vulnerability in smart contracts
Motivation: Financial gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/netease.jpeg
NetEase
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

NetEase company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Illusory company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Illusory company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas NetEase company has not reported any.

In the current year, Illusory company has reported more cyber incidents than NetEase company.

Neither NetEase company nor Illusory company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither NetEase company nor Illusory company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither NetEase company nor Illusory company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Illusory company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while NetEase company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Illusory nor NetEase holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

NetEase company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Illusory company.

NetEase company employs more people globally than Illusory company, reflecting its scale as a Technology, Information and Internet.

Neither Illusory nor NetEase holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Illusory nor NetEase holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Illusory nor NetEase holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Illusory nor NetEase holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Illusory nor NetEase holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Illusory nor NetEase holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L