Comparison Overview

Illusory

VS

Myntra

Illusory

1603 Capitol Ave, Cheyenne, 82001, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 700 and 749

Illusory makes it easier to scrape online data and perform automated tasks without getting blocked or detected. Train AI language models, conduct market research, or run mission-critical operations with our powerful, bare metal mobile proxies.

NAICS: 513
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Myntra

Devarabeesanahalli Main Road, Bengaluru, Karnataka, IN, 560103
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 800 and 849

At Myntra, we don’t just follow fashion - we define it. As India's leading fashion, lifestyle, and beauty destination, we bring together the best of style, technology, and innovation to create a seamless shopping experience for our customers. With a commitment to empowering self-expression, we curate over 13,000+ brands and labels, blending global trends with India’s unique fashion pulse. Our people are at the heart of everything we do. We thrive on innovation and impact, where data-driven insights and cutting-edge technology shape the future of fashion. We encourage out-of-the-box thinking, collaboration with leaders and experts, and driving meaningful change. Myntraites have a passion for fashion - we take pride in being India's voice in fashion and in the brand we stand for. Our non-hierarchical, inclusive culture values ownership, meritocracy, and self-driven individuals who challenge the status quo and grow with every opportunity. We believe in empowering every Myntraite by providing the freedom to shape their career, fostering an environment where creativity thrives, and ensuring well-being and self-expression for all. If you thrive in a fast-paced, result-driven environment and share our passion for fashion, Myntra is the place for you. Explore opportunities: https://jobs.myntra.com/home Be The Trend. Be Myntra.

NAICS: 513
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 16,866
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/illusoryio.jpeg
Illusory
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/myntra.jpeg
Myntra
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Illusory
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Myntra
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Average (This Year)

Illusory has 11.11% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Myntra in 2025.

Incident History — Illusory (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Illusory cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Myntra (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Myntra cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/illusoryio.jpeg
Illusory
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Exploitation of a software vulnerability in smart contracts
Motivation: Financial gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/myntra.jpeg
Myntra
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Myntra company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Illusory company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Illusory company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Myntra company has not reported any.

In the current year, Illusory company has reported more cyber incidents than Myntra company.

Neither Myntra company nor Illusory company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Myntra company nor Illusory company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Myntra company nor Illusory company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Illusory company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Myntra company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Illusory nor Myntra holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Myntra company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Illusory company.

Myntra company employs more people globally than Illusory company, reflecting its scale as a Technology, Information and Internet.

Neither Illusory nor Myntra holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Illusory nor Myntra holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Illusory nor Myntra holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Illusory nor Myntra holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Illusory nor Myntra holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Illusory nor Myntra holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L