Comparison Overview

il lavoro culturale

VS

powerHouse Books

il lavoro culturale

None
Last Update: 2025-11-21
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.lavoroculturale.org/

il lavoro culturale è un blog (ISSN 2384-9274) organizzato e interamente gestito da precari della ricerca e dei lavori cognitivi che pubblica articoli e ricerche su tematiche quali: il lavoro precario e le sue forme, beni comuni e nuove vie del politico, immigrazione e forme della cittadinanza, emergenze e cultura del rischio, open web e free software, cultura visiva e forme mediatiche del consenso. Il blog un progetto editoriale dell’Associazione "il lavoro culturale".

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

powerHouse Books

37 Main St, Brooklyn, 11201, US
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.powerhousebooks.com

powerHouse Books, world-renowned and critically acclaimed publisher, is best known for a diverse publishing programme—specialized in fine art, documentary, pop culture, fashion, and celebrity books. We have blazed a trail through the staid book publishing industry, releasing books that have sparked cultural trends and redefined commonly held perceptions of the purpose and role of art books in contemporary culture.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/il-lavoro-culturale.jpeg
il lavoro culturale
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/powerhouse-books.jpeg
powerHouse Books
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
il lavoro culturale
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
powerHouse Books
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for il lavoro culturale in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for powerHouse Books in 2025.

Incident History — il lavoro culturale (X = Date, Y = Severity)

il lavoro culturale cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — powerHouse Books (X = Date, Y = Severity)

powerHouse Books cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/il-lavoro-culturale.jpeg
il lavoro culturale
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/powerhouse-books.jpeg
powerHouse Books
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

il lavoro culturale company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to powerHouse Books company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, powerHouse Books company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to il lavoro culturale company.

In the current year, powerHouse Books company and il lavoro culturale company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither powerHouse Books company nor il lavoro culturale company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither powerHouse Books company nor il lavoro culturale company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither powerHouse Books company nor il lavoro culturale company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither il lavoro culturale company nor powerHouse Books company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither il lavoro culturale nor powerHouse Books holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither il lavoro culturale company nor powerHouse Books company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

powerHouse Books company employs more people globally than il lavoro culturale company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither il lavoro culturale nor powerHouse Books holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither il lavoro culturale nor powerHouse Books holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither il lavoro culturale nor powerHouse Books holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither il lavoro culturale nor powerHouse Books holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither il lavoro culturale nor powerHouse Books holds HIPAA certification.

Neither il lavoro culturale nor powerHouse Books holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References