Comparison Overview

IKONICS

VS

Curtis 1000

IKONICS

4832 Grand Ave, Duluth, MN, 55807, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Derived from the Greek, eikon, or image, the fundamental business of the IKONICS is the creation and transfer of physical and visual images. Through processes based in photochemistry, abrasive etching, chemical etching and other technologies, IKONICS participates in a diverse spectrum of markets. From traditional and high-tech screen printing, to decorative and industrial etching and imaging, IKONICS conducts business in over 90 countries.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 89
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Curtis 1000

1725 Roe Crest Dr, North Mankato, Minnesota, 56003, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

Curtis 1000 is uniting under our parent company, Taylor Corporation, as one cohesive brand. Adapting the Taylor brand allows us to easily portray the strengths of our teams, capabilities, and facilities across Taylor. The key members you know and rely on for the success of your program will continue to support you as they always have. To continue to receive our updates, please follow Taylor Corporation on LinkedIn. For more information please contact us at taylor.com For more than 135 years, Curtis 1000 has been advising its clients on the most effective ways to communicate with their customers and employees. As technology evolved over the years from print to digital tactics, Curtis has invested in robust systems and user-friendly portals to keep ahead of trends and make the execution of business communications programs even easier. We work to diagnose our clients’ challenges in order to recommend practical solutions that solve their toughest communication problems. With a wide array of creative services and nationwide network for print production and fulfillment, Curtis can design and distribute your message faster, securely and with great impact. Our offerings include: commercial and digital print, direct marketing, statements and billing, labels, packaging, print management, promotional marketing, signs and graphics, stationery programs and technology solutions. We have deep expertise serving mid-market companies in a wide range of industries: beauty and personal care, education, financial services, food and beverage, healthcare, manufacturing, non-profits, pharmaceuticals, retail and restaurants, and travel and entertainment.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 379
Subsidiaries: 49
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ikonics-corporation.jpeg
IKONICS
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/curtis-1000.jpeg
Curtis 1000
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
IKONICS
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Curtis 1000
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IKONICS in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Curtis 1000 in 2025.

Incident History — IKONICS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IKONICS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Curtis 1000 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Curtis 1000 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ikonics-corporation.jpeg
IKONICS
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/curtis-1000.jpeg
Curtis 1000
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2018
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Curtis 1000 company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to IKONICS company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Curtis 1000 company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas IKONICS company has not reported any.

In the current year, Curtis 1000 company and IKONICS company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Curtis 1000 company nor IKONICS company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Curtis 1000 company has disclosed at least one data breach, while IKONICS company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Curtis 1000 company nor IKONICS company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither IKONICS company nor Curtis 1000 company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither IKONICS nor Curtis 1000 holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Curtis 1000 company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to IKONICS company.

Curtis 1000 company employs more people globally than IKONICS company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither IKONICS nor Curtis 1000 holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither IKONICS nor Curtis 1000 holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither IKONICS nor Curtis 1000 holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither IKONICS nor Curtis 1000 holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither IKONICS nor Curtis 1000 holds HIPAA certification.

Neither IKONICS nor Curtis 1000 holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N