Comparison Overview

IKONICS

VS

Card USA, Inc.

IKONICS

4832 Grand Ave, Duluth, MN, 55807, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Derived from the Greek, eikon, or image, the fundamental business of the IKONICS is the creation and transfer of physical and visual images. Through processes based in photochemistry, abrasive etching, chemical etching and other technologies, IKONICS participates in a diverse spectrum of markets. From traditional and high-tech screen printing, to decorative and industrial etching and imaging, IKONICS conducts business in over 90 countries.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 89
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Card USA, Inc.

201 N Ocean Dr, Hollywood, Florida, US, 33019
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Card USA Inc. is a card production management company and has been ranked as a top card manufacturer of cards by Nilson Report and listed as one of the 500 fastest growing companies in the US by INC. Magazine. Card USA’s business has steadily expanded and specialized in the Smart Card, EMV, SIM / USIM Cards, Prepaid Cards, Retail Gift & Prepaid card packaging, Government cards, and Bank Card markets. Our mission at CardUSA is to provide our clients with exceptional service in all areas of the production process. At the core of our mission, is the ability to reduce the cost of our products and services without sacrificing their quality and value. CardUSA is strongly committed to establishing and maintaining the relationship between our company and our customers. We also value our people as the only assets that appreciate. We are continually striving to create the best possible solutions for you to ensure that CardUSA continues to remain a leader in card manufacturing, personalization and fulfillment.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 20
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ikonics-corporation.jpeg
IKONICS
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/card-usa-inc-.jpeg
Card USA, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
IKONICS
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Card USA, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IKONICS in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Card USA, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — IKONICS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IKONICS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Card USA, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Card USA, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ikonics-corporation.jpeg
IKONICS
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/card-usa-inc-.jpeg
Card USA, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

IKONICS company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Card USA, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Card USA, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to IKONICS company.

In the current year, Card USA, Inc. company and IKONICS company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Card USA, Inc. company nor IKONICS company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Card USA, Inc. company nor IKONICS company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Card USA, Inc. company nor IKONICS company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither IKONICS company nor Card USA, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither IKONICS nor Card USA, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither IKONICS company nor Card USA, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

IKONICS company employs more people globally than Card USA, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither IKONICS nor Card USA, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither IKONICS nor Card USA, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither IKONICS nor Card USA, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither IKONICS nor Card USA, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither IKONICS nor Card USA, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither IKONICS nor Card USA, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N