Comparison Overview

IJF Group

VS

Workstation

IJF Group

undefined, Wingfield, South Australia, 5013, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-26
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://ijfgroup.com.au/

IJF Group is the parent company of iconic and well renowned joinery and interiors brands, IJF Australia and LUSSO Interiors, and LUSSO division IJF Living. The Group has 60 years of industry experience, enabling our companies to deliver upon the highest standard projects; aligning with our company values of quality, integrity, service, and stability.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 71
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Workstation

undefined, undefined, undefined, ec1m 4bu, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799
http://www.workstation-uk.com

Workstation (The Workstation London Ltd) is a privately owned Furniture Dealership founded in April 2001 by Nigel Symonds who is the only shareholder and Managing Director of the Company. Nigel and his team have rapidly achieved unparalleled success within the UK contract furniture market place, becoming Herman Miller’s largest distributor within Europe with an annual turnover to the year end May ‘09 of £16.0M During this period, Workstation has developed an outstanding reputation for the successful execution of major contract delivery operating at the top end of the commercial offi ce market sector whilst collaborating with some of the UK’s premier architectural and interior design practises to this end.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ijf-group.jpeg
IJF Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/workstation_2.jpeg
Workstation
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
IJF Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Workstation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IJF Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Workstation in 2025.

Incident History — IJF Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IJF Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Workstation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Workstation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ijf-group.jpeg
IJF Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/workstation_2.jpeg
Workstation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

IJF Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Workstation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Workstation company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to IJF Group company.

In the current year, Workstation company and IJF Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Workstation company nor IJF Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Workstation company nor IJF Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Workstation company nor IJF Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither IJF Group company nor Workstation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither IJF Group nor Workstation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

IJF Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Workstation company.

IJF Group company employs more people globally than Workstation company, reflecting its scale as a Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing.

Neither IJF Group nor Workstation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither IJF Group nor Workstation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither IJF Group nor Workstation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither IJF Group nor Workstation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither IJF Group nor Workstation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither IJF Group nor Workstation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References