Comparison Overview

IHH Healthcare

VS

Aster DM Healthcare

IHH Healthcare

Level 11 Block A, Pantai Hospital Kuala Lumpur, 8 Jalan Bukit Pantai, Kuala Lumpur, MY, 59100
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ihhhealthcare.com/

A world-leading integrated healthcare provider, IHH believes that making a difference starts with our aspiration to Care. For Good. Our team of 65,000 people commit to deliver greater good to our patients, people, the public and our planet, as we live our purpose each day to touch lives and transform care. Through our portfolio of trusted brands – Acibadem, Mount Elizabeth, Prince Court, Gleneagles, Fortis, Pantai and Parkway – we offer our patients comprehensive and personalised care ranging from primary to quaternary, and even ancillary services such as laboratory, diagnostics, imaging and rehabilitation. With our scale and reach in 10 countries, we continue to raise the bar in healthcare in our key markets of Malaysia, Singapore, Türkiye, India, Greater China (including Hong Kong) and beyond. In partnership with our stakeholders, we will co-create a sustainable future for all as we work towards our vision to become the world’s most trusted healthcare services network.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 25,724
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Aster DM Healthcare

AE
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
http://www.asterdmhealthcare.com/

From a single medical centre to a performance-driven healthcare enterprise spread across more than 400+ medical establishments, including 15 hospitals, 120 clinics and 307 pharmacies in GCC and growing, Aster DM Healthcare has transitioned into being the leading healthcare authority across the Middle East. Currently one of the largest and fastest growing conglomerates in the MENA region, Aster DM Healthcare covers the full spectrum of healthcare services. An expansive portfolio includes hospitals and clinics, pharmacies, diagnostic centres, educational institutions, healthcare management and healthcare support systems. Headquartered in Dubai, the Aster DM network now encompasses more than 19,657 employees( Doctors, Nurses, Others) with JCI accredited clinics and diagnostic centres. Never content to rest on its laurels, Aster DM Healthcare is constantly seeking opportunities to set new yardsticks with advanced developments. With many more innovative and ambitious initiatives, Aster DM Healthcare has radically catalyzed the healthcare revolution across Middle East Each of the Group’s verticals is a symbol of distinction, driven by the commitment to build a healthier tomorrow and to take healthcare to the next level of excellence.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 18,560
Subsidiaries: 9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ihh-healthcare.jpeg
IHH Healthcare
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/asterdmhealthcare.jpeg
Aster DM Healthcare
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
IHH Healthcare
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Aster DM Healthcare
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IHH Healthcare in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Aster DM Healthcare in 2025.

Incident History — IHH Healthcare (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IHH Healthcare cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Aster DM Healthcare (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aster DM Healthcare cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ihh-healthcare.jpeg
IHH Healthcare
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/asterdmhealthcare.jpeg
Aster DM Healthcare
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Aster DM Healthcare company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to IHH Healthcare company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Aster DM Healthcare company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to IHH Healthcare company.

In the current year, Aster DM Healthcare company and IHH Healthcare company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Aster DM Healthcare company nor IHH Healthcare company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Aster DM Healthcare company nor IHH Healthcare company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Aster DM Healthcare company nor IHH Healthcare company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither IHH Healthcare company nor Aster DM Healthcare company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither IHH Healthcare nor Aster DM Healthcare holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Aster DM Healthcare company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to IHH Healthcare company.

IHH Healthcare company employs more people globally than Aster DM Healthcare company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither IHH Healthcare nor Aster DM Healthcare holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither IHH Healthcare nor Aster DM Healthcare holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither IHH Healthcare nor Aster DM Healthcare holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither IHH Healthcare nor Aster DM Healthcare holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither IHH Healthcare nor Aster DM Healthcare holds HIPAA certification.

Neither IHH Healthcare nor Aster DM Healthcare holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References