Comparison Overview

IHH Healthcare

VS

Allegheny Health Network

IHH Healthcare

Level 11 Block A, Pantai Hospital Kuala Lumpur, 8 Jalan Bukit Pantai, Kuala Lumpur, MY, 59100
Last Update: 2026-01-17

A world-leading multinational healthcare provider, IHH believes that making a difference starts with our aspiration to Care. For Good. Our team of 70,000 people commit to deliver greater good to our patients, people, the public and our planet, as we live our purpose each day to touch lives and transform care. Through our portfolio of trusted brands – Acibadem, Fortis, Gleneagles, Island, Mount Elizabeth, Pantai, Parkway and Prince Court, – we offer our patients comprehensive and personalised care ranging from primary to quaternary, and even ancillary services such as laboratory, diagnostics, imaging and rehabilitation. With our scale and reach in 10 countries, we continue to raise the bar in healthcare in our key markets of Malaysia, Singapore, Türkiye, India, Greater China (including Hong Kong) and beyond. In partnership with our stakeholders, we will co-create a sustainable future for all as we work towards our vision to become the world’s most trusted healthcare services network.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 27,024
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Allegheny Health Network

4800 Friendship Ave, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, US, 15224
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799

Allegheny Health Network is an integrated health care delivery system serving the greater Western Pennsylvania region. More than 2,600 physicians and 21,000 employees serve the system's 14 hospitals as well as its ambulatory medical and surgery centers, Health + Wellness Pavilions, and hundreds of physician practice locations. AHN is a proud part of Highmark Health.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 11,374
Subsidiaries: 15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ihh-healthcare.jpeg
IHH Healthcare
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/allegheny-health-network.jpeg
Allegheny Health Network
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
IHH Healthcare
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Allegheny Health Network
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IHH Healthcare in 2026.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Allegheny Health Network in 2026.

Incident History — IHH Healthcare (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IHH Healthcare cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Allegheny Health Network (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Allegheny Health Network cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ihh-healthcare.jpeg
IHH Healthcare
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/allegheny-health-network.jpeg
Allegheny Health Network
Incidents

Date Detected: 06/2023
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Account Takeover
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: External Hacking
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2022
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Phishing
Blog: Blog

FAQ

IHH Healthcare company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Allegheny Health Network company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Allegheny Health Network company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas IHH Healthcare company has not reported any.

In the current year, Allegheny Health Network company and IHH Healthcare company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Allegheny Health Network company nor IHH Healthcare company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Allegheny Health Network company has disclosed at least one data breach, while IHH Healthcare company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Allegheny Health Network company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while IHH Healthcare company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither IHH Healthcare company nor Allegheny Health Network company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither IHH Healthcare nor Allegheny Health Network holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Allegheny Health Network company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to IHH Healthcare company.

IHH Healthcare company employs more people globally than Allegheny Health Network company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither IHH Healthcare nor Allegheny Health Network holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither IHH Healthcare nor Allegheny Health Network holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither IHH Healthcare nor Allegheny Health Network holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither IHH Healthcare nor Allegheny Health Network holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither IHH Healthcare nor Allegheny Health Network holds HIPAA certification.

Neither IHH Healthcare nor Allegheny Health Network holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H