Comparison Overview

IHEP

VS

Gemeente Eindhoven

IHEP

None
Last Update: 2025-11-24
Between 800 and 849

Institut hospodářské a environmentální politiky je vzdělávacím institutem pod záštitou občanského sdružení Sealsfield a jeho hlavním cílem je posilování společenské debaty o klíčových tématech České republiky a vzdělávání české společnosti v oblasti práva, ekonomie, hospodářské, environmentální a sociální politiky, politologie a regionálního rozvoje. Chceme poskytovat nejen svým čtenářům možnost vzdělávat se, rozvíjet své schopnosti a získávat potřebné informace pro své rozhodování. Příspěvky autorů jak z řad studentů tak odborníků budou spojovány snahou analýzy problému, vyvolání společenské debaty a přispěním návrhu řešení.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Gemeente Eindhoven

Stadhuisplein 2, Eindhoven, 5611, NL
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Eindhoven is dé stad van innovatie, technologie, design en vooral van toekomst. In het hart van onze snelgroeiende stad werken we met ruim 2700 collega’s vol energie aan een fijne stad om in te wonen, werken en recreëren. Met betrokken bewoners, partners en maatschappelijke instanties staan we samen voor onze stad. Meer weten over werken voor gemeente Eindhoven? Kijk op werkenvooreindhoven.nl

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 2,990
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
IHEP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gemeente-eindhoven.jpeg
Gemeente Eindhoven
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
IHEP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Gemeente Eindhoven
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IHEP in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gemeente Eindhoven in 2025.

Incident History — IHEP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IHEP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Gemeente Eindhoven (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gemeente Eindhoven cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
IHEP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gemeente-eindhoven.jpeg
Gemeente Eindhoven
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

IHEP company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Gemeente Eindhoven company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Gemeente Eindhoven company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to IHEP company.

In the current year, Gemeente Eindhoven company and IHEP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Gemeente Eindhoven company nor IHEP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Gemeente Eindhoven company nor IHEP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Gemeente Eindhoven company nor IHEP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither IHEP company nor Gemeente Eindhoven company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither IHEP nor Gemeente Eindhoven holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither IHEP company nor Gemeente Eindhoven company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Gemeente Eindhoven company employs more people globally than IHEP company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither IHEP nor Gemeente Eindhoven holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither IHEP nor Gemeente Eindhoven holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither IHEP nor Gemeente Eindhoven holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither IHEP nor Gemeente Eindhoven holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither IHEP nor Gemeente Eindhoven holds HIPAA certification.

Neither IHEP nor Gemeente Eindhoven holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H