Comparison Overview

IGT

VS

Instagram

IGT

6355 S Buffalo Dr, Las Vegas, NV, US, 89113
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 0 and 549

IGT is a leading global provider of gaming, digital and financial technology solutions, formed through the combination of International Game Technology PLC’s Gaming & Digital Business and Everi Holdings Inc. IGT’s offering spans gaming machines, game content and systems, iGaming, sports betting, cash access, loyalty and player engagement solutions, enabling it to deliver integrated, customer-centric experiences across land-based and digital environments. Organized into Gaming, Digital and FinTech business units, IGT drives innovation, efficiency and value for casino, digital and hospitality operators worldwide. The company is headquartered in Las Vegas.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 9,833
Subsidiaries: 13
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Instagram

None
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

More than one billion people around the world use Instagram, and we’re proud to be bringing them closer to the people and things they love. Instagram inspires people to see the world differently, discover new interests, and express themselves. Since launching in 2010, our community has grown at a rapid pace. Our teams are growing fast, too, and we’re looking for talent across engineering, product management, design, research, analytics, technical program management, operations, and more. In addition to our headquarters in Menlo Park, we have thriving offices in New York City and San Francisco where teams are doing impactful work every day.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 43,423
Subsidiaries: 21
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
11
Attack type number
4

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/igt.jpeg
IGT
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/instagram.jpeg
Instagram
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
IGT
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Instagram
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

IGT has 127.27% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Instagram in 2025.

Incident History — IGT (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IGT cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Instagram (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Instagram cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/igt.jpeg
IGT
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: financial gain, data extortion
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2022
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: financial gain, data extortion
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/instagram.jpeg
Instagram
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Contact Discovery Feature Abuse, Brute-Force Queries, Metadata Exploitation
Motivation: Data Harvesting, Targeted Phishing Preparation, Identity-Based Social Engineering, Fraud Enablement
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: abuse of platform feature, lack of rate limiting, automated enumeration
Motivation: research purposes, demonstration of vulnerability, potential for malicious exploitation by third parties
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Unsafe deserialization (Python pickle), ZeroMQ (ZMQ) misuse
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Instagram company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to IGT company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Instagram company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to IGT company.

In the current year, Instagram company has reported more cyber incidents than IGT company.

IGT company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Instagram company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Instagram company has disclosed at least one data breach, while IGT company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Instagram company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while IGT company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Instagram company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while IGT company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither IGT nor Instagram holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Instagram company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to IGT company.

Instagram company employs more people globally than IGT company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Neither IGT nor Instagram holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither IGT nor Instagram holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither IGT nor Instagram holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither IGT nor Instagram holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither IGT nor Instagram holds HIPAA certification.

Neither IGT nor Instagram holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.