Comparison Overview

IGRAF

VS

PMD - Design de Comunicação

IGRAF

None
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Desarrollamos diseño gráfico publicitario enfocado a la imagen corporativa, diseñando el Logotipo y la publicidad o material corporativo. Nos hemos especializado en el diseño gráfico digital enfocado a medios electrónicos como son: las paginas web; sistemas para empresas a través del internet. Hoy en dia nos estamos enfocado a la gestión de las principales Redes Sociales.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

PMD - Design de Comunicação

Estrada da Circunvalação, Senhora da Hora, Porto, 4460-282, PT
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

PMD é um estúdio de design de comunicação gráfica com 7 anos de existência. Concretiza todos os aspectos do projecto nas diversas vertentes de design gráfico, multimédia e web design. A PMD presta serviços nas seguintes áreas de comunicação visual: Design Gráfico · Logótipos · Manuais de Normas · Estacionários · Cartazes · Embalagens · Flyers · Capas Livros · Calendários Design Editorial · Revistas · Livros · Jornais · Relatórios e Contas · Newsletters · Brochuras Publicidade · Anúncios Institucionais Web Design · Websites · e-Mailings · e-News · Banners

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/igraf.jpeg
IGRAF
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pmd---design-de-comunica-o.jpeg
PMD - Design de Comunicação
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
IGRAF
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
PMD - Design de Comunicação
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IGRAF in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PMD - Design de Comunicação in 2025.

Incident History — IGRAF (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IGRAF cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — PMD - Design de Comunicação (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PMD - Design de Comunicação cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/igraf.jpeg
IGRAF
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pmd---design-de-comunica-o.jpeg
PMD - Design de Comunicação
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

IGRAF company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to PMD - Design de Comunicação company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, PMD - Design de Comunicação company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to IGRAF company.

In the current year, PMD - Design de Comunicação company and IGRAF company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither PMD - Design de Comunicação company nor IGRAF company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither PMD - Design de Comunicação company nor IGRAF company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither PMD - Design de Comunicação company nor IGRAF company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither IGRAF company nor PMD - Design de Comunicação company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither IGRAF nor PMD - Design de Comunicação holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither IGRAF company nor PMD - Design de Comunicação company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

PMD - Design de Comunicação company employs more people globally than IGRAF company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither IGRAF nor PMD - Design de Comunicação holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither IGRAF nor PMD - Design de Comunicação holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither IGRAF nor PMD - Design de Comunicação holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither IGRAF nor PMD - Design de Comunicação holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither IGRAF nor PMD - Design de Comunicação holds HIPAA certification.

Neither IGRAF nor PMD - Design de Comunicação holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X