Comparison Overview

Ifakara Health Institute

VS

Galveston County Health District

Ifakara Health Institute

Plot 463, Mikocheni, PO Box 78373, TZ
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Ifakara Health Institute (IHI) is one of Africa’s most eminent health research organisations. With a history of more than 50 years, IHI is an independent non-profit organisation, registered in Tanzania and led by Tanzanians. IHI enjoys collaborations with world-renowned centres of tropical health research. With a staff of 450, including 25 PhD scientists, IHI publishes over 100 articles per year in peer-reviewed journals. IHI conducts a wide range of health-related research, covering areas such as malaria; neglected and emerging tropical diseases; maternal, neonatal and child health and demography. Disciplinary research groups include biomedical & environmental studies, clinical trials, health-systems research, monitoring and evaluation and policy translation. The organisation has offices in Ifakara, Dar es Salaam and Bagamoyo.

NAICS: 92312
NAICS Definition: Administration of Public Health Programs
Employees: 761
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Galveston County Health District

9850 Emmett F Lowry Expy, Texas City, 77591, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

The Galveston County Health District is committed to identifying public health issues that impact our everyday life. We work daily to prevent disease, protect against public health threats and promote good health for all of Galveston County. Mission: Protecting and promoting the One Health of Galveston County. Vision: To be a pillar, promoter, protector, and provider of healthfulness in Galveston County. Mission: Protecting and promoting the optimal health and well-being of Galveston County. Vision: To become the healthiest county in Texas.

NAICS: 92312
NAICS Definition: Administration of Public Health Programs
Employees: 258
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ifakara-health-institute.jpeg
Ifakara Health Institute
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/galveston-county-health-district.jpeg
Galveston County Health District
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ifakara Health Institute
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Galveston County Health District
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Health Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ifakara Health Institute in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Health Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Galveston County Health District in 2025.

Incident History — Ifakara Health Institute (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ifakara Health Institute cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Galveston County Health District (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Galveston County Health District cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ifakara-health-institute.jpeg
Ifakara Health Institute
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/galveston-county-health-district.jpeg
Galveston County Health District
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Ifakara Health Institute company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Galveston County Health District company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Galveston County Health District company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Ifakara Health Institute company.

In the current year, Galveston County Health District company and Ifakara Health Institute company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Galveston County Health District company nor Ifakara Health Institute company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Galveston County Health District company nor Ifakara Health Institute company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Galveston County Health District company nor Ifakara Health Institute company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ifakara Health Institute company nor Galveston County Health District company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ifakara Health Institute nor Galveston County Health District holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Ifakara Health Institute company nor Galveston County Health District company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Ifakara Health Institute company employs more people globally than Galveston County Health District company, reflecting its scale as a Public Health.

Neither Ifakara Health Institute nor Galveston County Health District holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ifakara Health Institute nor Galveston County Health District holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ifakara Health Institute nor Galveston County Health District holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ifakara Health Institute nor Galveston County Health District holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ifakara Health Institute nor Galveston County Health District holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ifakara Health Institute nor Galveston County Health District holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.