Comparison Overview

ieso

VS

Couples Therapy Inc

ieso

The Jeffreys Building, Cowley Road, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, CB4 0DS, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

ieso is one of the UK’s leading digital mental healthcare business. It is addressing the global mental health crisis by developing clinically evidenced assessment and treatment products that enable everyone with a common mental health condition to recover. ieso uses technology and data science to better understand, prevent, detect, and treat mental health conditions. Its core product offers AI-powered, therapist-delivered, digital cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT). With a growing network of 500 fully qualified therapists, ieso serves more than 20 million adults through the UK National Health Service (NHS). By analysing over 700 million data points contained in the world’s largest outcome-linked mental health dataset, ieso’s AI and data research teams are decoding the active components of therapy and enabling ground-breaking approaches for digital mental healthcare. ieso is now developing new digital products that will support the transformation needed in global mental healthcare. Small-print for Recruitment Agencies ieso does not accept CVs submitted by recruitment agents in any situation where we have not directly engaged your company, in writing within the last two calendar months, to supply candidates for a specific vacancy. Any CVs received in this manner will be treated as the property of ieso, and any agency Terms & Conditions associated with the use of such CVs will be considered null and void. The handling of personal data for recruitment purposes is covered in our Privacy Notice.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 421
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Couples Therapy Inc

125 Guest St, None, Boston, Massachusetts, US, 02135
Last Update: 2026-01-21

Happy, long-lasting relationships are developed over time. You can learn to express your needs, be creative and kind when you disagree, and become more playful and erotic in your relationship. When you need help, know what constitutes a real effective helper. You'll be in the best place to make the right decision for you and your loved one. Ours is a lens that studies loving connection, bonding and how those bonds get broken and mended. We see people not as a collection of individuals, but as a network of families and friends. Collectively, we too, represent a connected network. Each of us forms a broad tapestry of ages, ethnicities, cultures, language, and knowledge, but we all share a passion for working with couples. Couples Therapy Inc. has an incredible "dream team"​ of some of the most highly-trained credentialed couples therapists in the world. But our team members not only have to be motivated couples therapists, they have to be kind and thoughtful people in order to be invited to join. They must yearn for professional connections with other high-achievers like themselves and have a never-ending passion for excellence.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/iesohealth.jpeg
ieso
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/couples-therapy-inc.jpeg
Couples Therapy Inc
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ieso
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Couples Therapy Inc
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ieso in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Couples Therapy Inc in 2026.

Incident History — ieso (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ieso cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Couples Therapy Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Couples Therapy Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/iesohealth.jpeg
ieso
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/couples-therapy-inc.jpeg
Couples Therapy Inc
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

ieso company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Couples Therapy Inc company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Couples Therapy Inc company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to ieso company.

In the current year, Couples Therapy Inc company and ieso company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Couples Therapy Inc company nor ieso company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Couples Therapy Inc company nor ieso company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Couples Therapy Inc company nor ieso company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ieso company nor Couples Therapy Inc company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ieso nor Couples Therapy Inc holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Couples Therapy Inc company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to ieso company.

ieso company employs more people globally than Couples Therapy Inc company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither ieso nor Couples Therapy Inc holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ieso nor Couples Therapy Inc holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ieso nor Couples Therapy Inc holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ieso nor Couples Therapy Inc holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ieso nor Couples Therapy Inc holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ieso nor Couples Therapy Inc holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N