Comparison Overview

Integrated Disease Surveillance Programme (IDSP)

VS

Counter Tools

Integrated Disease Surveillance Programme (IDSP)

Shamnath Marg, Civil Lines, IN
Last Update: 2026-04-01
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://idsp.mohfw.gov.in/

Integrated Disease Surveillance Project (IDSP) was launched by the Hon’ble Union Minister of Health & Family Welfare in November 2004 for a period up to March 2010. The project was restructured and extended up to March 2012. Since the 12th five-year plan period, the project continues with a 100% domestic budget under NHM as the Integrated Disease Surveillance Programme. A Central Surveillance Unit (CSU) at Delhi, State Surveillance Units (SSU) at all State/UT headquarters, and District Surveillance Units (DSU) at all Districts in the country have been established. The programme has been a pioneer in adopting digital health technology and has completely transitioned into a paperless, real-time, and case-based reporting system. India is offering IDSP-IHIP as a digital public health good to other Countries.

NAICS: 92312
NAICS Definition: Administration of Public Health Programs
Employees: 27
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Counter Tools

205 Lloyd Street, Carrboro, NC, 27510, US
Last Update: 2026-03-18
Between 750 and 799
http://countertools.org/

Counter Tools empowers communities to become healthier places for all. With our partners, we advance place-based public health by enacting and enforcing policy, systems, and environmental interventions that promote health equity across communities. We aim to reduce the detrimental impact of unhealthy substances such as tobacco, alcohol, cannabis, and unhealthy food at the consumer’s primary point of exposure and access: the retail environment. What sets us apart: • Comprehensive guidance. We help you to not only collect data, but to manage, interpret, and leverage it to tell stories that inspire change. • Accessibility. We make complex systems, information, and goals manageable and practical. • Expertise. With our deep knowledge of how the retail environment impacts community health, we understand how to influence state- and local-level decision makers throughout the policy change process.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/idsp-ncdc.jpeg
Integrated Disease Surveillance Programme (IDSP)
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/counter-tools.jpeg
Counter Tools
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Integrated Disease Surveillance Programme (IDSP)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Counter Tools
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Health Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Integrated Disease Surveillance Programme (IDSP) in 2026.

Incidents vs Public Health Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Counter Tools in 2026.

Incident History — Integrated Disease Surveillance Programme (IDSP) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Integrated Disease Surveillance Programme (IDSP) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Counter Tools (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Counter Tools cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/idsp-ncdc.jpeg
Integrated Disease Surveillance Programme (IDSP)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/counter-tools.jpeg
Counter Tools
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Counter Tools company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Integrated Disease Surveillance Programme (IDSP) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Counter Tools company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Integrated Disease Surveillance Programme (IDSP) company.

In the current year, Counter Tools company and Integrated Disease Surveillance Programme (IDSP) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Counter Tools company nor Integrated Disease Surveillance Programme (IDSP) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Counter Tools company nor Integrated Disease Surveillance Programme (IDSP) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Counter Tools company nor Integrated Disease Surveillance Programme (IDSP) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Integrated Disease Surveillance Programme (IDSP) company nor Counter Tools company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Integrated Disease Surveillance Programme (IDSP) nor Counter Tools holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Integrated Disease Surveillance Programme (IDSP) company nor Counter Tools company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Integrated Disease Surveillance Programme (IDSP) company employs more people globally than Counter Tools company, reflecting its scale as a Public Health.

Neither Integrated Disease Surveillance Programme (IDSP) nor Counter Tools holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Integrated Disease Surveillance Programme (IDSP) nor Counter Tools holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Integrated Disease Surveillance Programme (IDSP) nor Counter Tools holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Integrated Disease Surveillance Programme (IDSP) nor Counter Tools holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Integrated Disease Surveillance Programme (IDSP) nor Counter Tools holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Integrated Disease Surveillance Programme (IDSP) nor Counter Tools holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References