Comparison Overview

Foundry ANZ

VS

National Geographic

Foundry ANZ

Level 10, North Sydney, NSW, 2060, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-21
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://foundryco.com/

Foundry, formerly IDG Australia Pty Ltd is a wholly owned subsidiary of IDG Inc, Foundry has played a key role in every major milestone, announcement, and development in modern technology since 1964. Today, Foundry continues to lead the world by helping companies bring their visions to reality through a combination of media, marketing technologies and proprietary data. Our technology platforms of Triblio, Selling Simplified, KickFire and LeadSift are powered by data from an owned and operated ecosystem of global editorial brands, awards, and events, all engineered and integrated to drive marketing campaigns for technology companies. Foundry is dedicated to generating and innovating with data, driving demand for technology marketers with 38 offices in markets around the globe. Foundry is a wholly owned subsidiary of International Data Group, Inc. (IDG), the world’s leading tech media, data, research and marketing services company.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 65
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

National Geographic

1145 17th Street NW, Washington, DC, 20036-4688, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 800 and 849
http://www.nationalgeographic.com

Since its inception more than 135 years ago, the core purpose of National Geographic has been to further the knowledge and awareness of our world. We are the world’s leading multimedia destination for the best stories in science, exploration and adventure. And our unrivaled sense of purpose and mission is best evidenced by the fact that nearly 30% of our profits go to funding real scientists, explorers, and conservationists. Official LinkedIn of National Geographic

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 8,465
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/idg-communications-australia.jpeg
Foundry ANZ
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-geographic.jpeg
National Geographic
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Foundry ANZ
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
National Geographic
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Foundry ANZ in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for National Geographic in 2025.

Incident History — Foundry ANZ (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Foundry ANZ cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — National Geographic (X = Date, Y = Severity)

National Geographic cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/idg-communications-australia.jpeg
Foundry ANZ
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-geographic.jpeg
National Geographic
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

National Geographic company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Foundry ANZ company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, National Geographic company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Foundry ANZ company.

In the current year, National Geographic company and Foundry ANZ company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither National Geographic company nor Foundry ANZ company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither National Geographic company nor Foundry ANZ company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither National Geographic company nor Foundry ANZ company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Foundry ANZ company nor National Geographic company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Foundry ANZ nor National Geographic holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

National Geographic company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Foundry ANZ company.

National Geographic company employs more people globally than Foundry ANZ company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Foundry ANZ nor National Geographic holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Foundry ANZ nor National Geographic holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Foundry ANZ nor National Geographic holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Foundry ANZ nor National Geographic holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Foundry ANZ nor National Geographic holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Foundry ANZ nor National Geographic holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References