Comparison Overview

IdeaLegal

VS

Dartmouth Law Journal

IdeaLegal

2240 N. Interstate Ave., Portland, OR, 97227, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

An innovative and client-focused IP and business boutique law firm. We offer clean and accessible legal products. We speak your language, not legalese. We draft contracts and handle disputes in a way that protects your business, not our egos. We have a combined 30 years of legal experience in consumer-focused industries: Amazon Brand Registry, Fashion & Apparel, Marketing & Ecommerce, Software & Technology, Entertainment & Production, Food & Beverage. We offer sophisticated and practical legal advice from attorneys with both big-firm and in-house expertise. We rely on technology and teamwork to cut out unnecessary overhead. We are a state-certified women-owned business enterprise (WBE) supporting the advancement of women in the legal profession. Our clients have included: Nike, CDBaby, The New Stack, OPB, Vacasa, Boke Bowl, MadHippie, Oregon Wild Harvest, Revant Optics.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Dartmouth Law Journal

Dartmouth College, Hanover, 03755, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

The Dartmouth Law Journal is the nation's premiere undergraduate journal of law. The Journal is published two times a year, in March and September. Selected articles undergo a strict editing process to prepare them for publication. The Journal has published works from judges, professors, law school students, and practitioners from across the nation. Launched as the Dartmouth College Undergraduate Journal of Law in the winter of 2003 by two Daniel Webster Legal Society Interns, Meg Thering '05 and Joshua Marcuse '04, the Dartmouth Law Journal provides students and faculty with a public forum for law-related ideas and discussion. In addition to publishing top scholarship, the Journal provides its contributors with a collaborative editorial process designed to help improve and refine their work. As a condition of article acceptance, contributors are asked to work closely with our editors throughout the revision process, re-examining and polishing their work for a broad readership. Our submissions address a diverse array of law-related questions and ideas.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 111
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/idealegal.jpeg
IdeaLegal
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dartmouth-law-journal.jpeg
Dartmouth Law Journal
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
IdeaLegal
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Dartmouth Law Journal
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IdeaLegal in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dartmouth Law Journal in 2025.

Incident History — IdeaLegal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IdeaLegal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Dartmouth Law Journal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dartmouth Law Journal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/idealegal.jpeg
IdeaLegal
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dartmouth-law-journal.jpeg
Dartmouth Law Journal
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Dartmouth Law Journal company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to IdeaLegal company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Dartmouth Law Journal company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to IdeaLegal company.

In the current year, Dartmouth Law Journal company and IdeaLegal company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Dartmouth Law Journal company nor IdeaLegal company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Dartmouth Law Journal company nor IdeaLegal company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Dartmouth Law Journal company nor IdeaLegal company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither IdeaLegal company nor Dartmouth Law Journal company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither IdeaLegal nor Dartmouth Law Journal holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither IdeaLegal company nor Dartmouth Law Journal company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Dartmouth Law Journal company employs more people globally than IdeaLegal company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither IdeaLegal nor Dartmouth Law Journal holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither IdeaLegal nor Dartmouth Law Journal holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither IdeaLegal nor Dartmouth Law Journal holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither IdeaLegal nor Dartmouth Law Journal holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither IdeaLegal nor Dartmouth Law Journal holds HIPAA certification.

Neither IdeaLegal nor Dartmouth Law Journal holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X