Comparison Overview

IDBI Bank

VS

Sberbank

IDBI Bank

IDBI Tower, WTC Complex,, Mumbai, 400005, IN
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 750 and 799

Welcome to IDBI Bank's LinkedIn page! We are a leading bank in India, with a rich legacy. At IDBI Bank, we believe in empowering our customers by providing them with a wide range of banking products and services to meet their financial needs. Whether you are an individual, a small business owner, or a large corporation, we have tailored solutions that are designed to help you achieve your financial goals. Our product portfolio includes savings accounts, current accounts, fixed deposits, loans, credit cards, and many more. We offer digital banking services such as Internet banking, mobile banking, and e-wallets to make banking more convenient and accessible for our customers. At IDBI Bank, we strongly believe in creating a culture of innovation, learning, and growth for our employees. We provide a supportive work environment that encourages our employees to explore their potential and develop new skills. Follow our LinkedIn page to stay updated on our latest news, events, and insights. We are dedicated to serving our customers and communities, and we look forward to connecting with you on LinkedIn. Thank you for connecting with IDBI Bank!

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 17,904
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Sberbank

RU
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 800 and 849

Сбер — крупнейший банк в России, поставщик надёжных технологических решений и один из ведущих финансовых институтов страны. Мы не боимся меняться и открывать новые горизонты, но в то же время остаёмся верными принципам, сформированным за нашу 180-летнюю историю. Такой подход позволяет нам создавать и развивать десятки технологичных направлений. Нашими сервисами пользуются миллионы людей, а над их созданием и совершенствованием работают десятки тысяч сотрудников. Sber is the largest bank in Russia, supplier of reliable technological solutions and one of the leading national financial institutions. We are not afraid to change and open up new horizons, but at the same time we remain true to the principles that have been formed over our 180-year history. This approach allows us to create and develop dozens of technological areas. Our services are used by millions of people, and thousands of employees are working on their creation and improvement.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 10,459
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/idbi-bank.jpeg
IDBI Bank
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sberbank.jpeg
Sberbank
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
IDBI Bank
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sberbank
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IDBI Bank in 2026.

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sberbank in 2026.

Incident History — IDBI Bank (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IDBI Bank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Sberbank (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sberbank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/idbi-bank.jpeg
IDBI Bank
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sberbank.jpeg
Sberbank
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Sberbank company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to IDBI Bank company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Sberbank company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to IDBI Bank company.

In the current year, Sberbank company and IDBI Bank company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Sberbank company nor IDBI Bank company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Sberbank company nor IDBI Bank company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Sberbank company nor IDBI Bank company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither IDBI Bank company nor Sberbank company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither IDBI Bank nor Sberbank holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Sberbank company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to IDBI Bank company.

IDBI Bank company employs more people globally than Sberbank company, reflecting its scale as a Banking.

Neither IDBI Bank nor Sberbank holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither IDBI Bank nor Sberbank holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither IDBI Bank nor Sberbank holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither IDBI Bank nor Sberbank holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither IDBI Bank nor Sberbank holds HIPAA certification.

Neither IDBI Bank nor Sberbank holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N