Comparison Overview

Interface Consulting and Psychological Services

VS

Hopewell Therapeutic Farm Community

Interface Consulting and Psychological Services

2000 S Dixie Hwy, Miami, 33133, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

We provide psychoeducational, Autism, and neuropsychological testing; behavioral therapy; and career services for children, teens, and adults. We specialize in treating OCD, anxiety, panic, ADD & ADHD, and career concerns, as well as diagnosing or testing for ADHD, learning disabilities (Dyslexia, Dysgraphia, Dyscalculia), and Autism from children to adults. We were trained at the PhD level in Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, Exposure and Response Prevention, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, and Executive Functioning training. We strive to integrate warmth, psychological science, and affirming practices in all we do. ICPS was proudly founded in 2017 by Dr. Irma Campos, PhD, Licensed Psychologist, and we serve Miami, other Florida cities, and over 40+ PSYPACT states. Hablamos Español.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Hopewell Therapeutic Farm Community

9637 St Rt 534, Mesopotamia, Ohio, 44062, US
Last Update: 2025-11-09

Hopewell is a therapeutic community located on a 325-acre farm in rural Mesopotamia, Ohio. We help adults with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and major depression develop the skills to manage their mental illness and eventually transition from Hopewell to a more independent living situation. Using the power of nature, meaningful work and a highly skilled, caring staff, Hopewell's program treats the whole person - mind, body and spirit. At Hopewell, we empower individuals to function at their highest level of effectiveness, leading to a more satisfying, self-reliant, and independent life, both during and after their stay. On Hopewell's farm, residents benefit from the animals, our nature therapy program, and from self-discovery – in our barns, barnyards, pastures, gardens, fields, meadows, ponds, and an extensive maple-filled forest, all interconnected with paths and laced with streams. Through meaningful work, our residents learn personal responsibility, establish a routine to encourage structuring of their time, learn to stop focusing on symptoms, and make important contributions to community life. We offer our two transition programs. Hopewell’s University Circle Transition Program provides to residents discharged from the farm a highly effective apartment-based program to support their transition to more independent living in the community. Another option is Club Hope, a transitional program for residents moving from Hopewell's residential therapeutic program to community living in Northeast Ohio. It is designed for people who have graduated from the residential program and are living successfully on their own or with family, but might benefit from involvement in a structured daily program at Hopewell's therapeutic farm. We believe that everyone can experience success, find a life of purpose and feel hope.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 41
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/icps.jpeg
Interface Consulting and Psychological Services
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hopewell-therapeutic-farm-community.jpeg
Hopewell Therapeutic Farm Community
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Interface Consulting and Psychological Services
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Hopewell Therapeutic Farm Community
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Interface Consulting and Psychological Services in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hopewell Therapeutic Farm Community in 2026.

Incident History — Interface Consulting and Psychological Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Interface Consulting and Psychological Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Hopewell Therapeutic Farm Community (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hopewell Therapeutic Farm Community cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/icps.jpeg
Interface Consulting and Psychological Services
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hopewell-therapeutic-farm-community.jpeg
Hopewell Therapeutic Farm Community
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Hopewell Therapeutic Farm Community company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Interface Consulting and Psychological Services company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Hopewell Therapeutic Farm Community company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Interface Consulting and Psychological Services company.

In the current year, Hopewell Therapeutic Farm Community company and Interface Consulting and Psychological Services company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Hopewell Therapeutic Farm Community company nor Interface Consulting and Psychological Services company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Hopewell Therapeutic Farm Community company nor Interface Consulting and Psychological Services company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Hopewell Therapeutic Farm Community company nor Interface Consulting and Psychological Services company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Interface Consulting and Psychological Services company nor Hopewell Therapeutic Farm Community company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Interface Consulting and Psychological Services nor Hopewell Therapeutic Farm Community holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Interface Consulting and Psychological Services company nor Hopewell Therapeutic Farm Community company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Hopewell Therapeutic Farm Community company employs more people globally than Interface Consulting and Psychological Services company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Interface Consulting and Psychological Services nor Hopewell Therapeutic Farm Community holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Interface Consulting and Psychological Services nor Hopewell Therapeutic Farm Community holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Interface Consulting and Psychological Services nor Hopewell Therapeutic Farm Community holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Interface Consulting and Psychological Services nor Hopewell Therapeutic Farm Community holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Interface Consulting and Psychological Services nor Hopewell Therapeutic Farm Community holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Interface Consulting and Psychological Services nor Hopewell Therapeutic Farm Community holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N