Comparison Overview

Stahl Packaging Coatings

VS

Rhino Print Management

Stahl Packaging Coatings

1600 Glenlake Avenue, Itasca, IL, 60143, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.stahl.com/

Stahl – Touching lives, for a better world Stahl is the global leader in specialty coatings and treatments for flexible materials. Together with its value chain partners, Stahl develops high-performance, low-impact coating solutions that touch the lives of people everywhere. Today, nearly a third of Stahl's R&D projects have a clear ESG foundation, with a focus on low-fossil-carbon alternatives using renewable feedstocks. Stahl is also committed to reducing its own environmental footprint and has set ambitious near-term targets, validated by the Science Based Targets initiative, to significantly reduce its greenhouse gas emissions. With nearly 2,000 employees and headquarters in Waalwijk, the Netherlands, Stahl operates a global network of 17 manufacturing sites and 37 strategically located application laboratories, supported by sales support offices in 22 countries.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 27
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Rhino Print Management

None
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799
http://www.rhinoprint.com.au/

Rhino Print Management offers design and print production of a wide range of print products for all types of businesses. We specialise in providing an end to end Print Management Solution. Some of our products include stationery, flyers, brochures, booklets, catalogues, posters, signage (internal & external), promo items and much more. Being truly independent we make sure we choose the right suppliers for the job. Using our network of approved suppliers and existing buying power locally and nationally, we can source the most competitive price so our clients are guaranteed value for money and a speedy efficient service.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/icpindustrial.jpeg
Stahl Packaging Coatings
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rhino-print-management.jpeg
Rhino Print Management
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Stahl Packaging Coatings
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Rhino Print Management
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stahl Packaging Coatings in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rhino Print Management in 2025.

Incident History — Stahl Packaging Coatings (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stahl Packaging Coatings cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Rhino Print Management (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rhino Print Management cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/icpindustrial.jpeg
Stahl Packaging Coatings
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rhino-print-management.jpeg
Rhino Print Management
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Stahl Packaging Coatings company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Rhino Print Management company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Rhino Print Management company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Stahl Packaging Coatings company.

In the current year, Rhino Print Management company and Stahl Packaging Coatings company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Rhino Print Management company nor Stahl Packaging Coatings company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Rhino Print Management company nor Stahl Packaging Coatings company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Rhino Print Management company nor Stahl Packaging Coatings company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Stahl Packaging Coatings company nor Rhino Print Management company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Stahl Packaging Coatings nor Rhino Print Management holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Stahl Packaging Coatings company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Rhino Print Management company.

Stahl Packaging Coatings company employs more people globally than Rhino Print Management company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Stahl Packaging Coatings nor Rhino Print Management holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Stahl Packaging Coatings nor Rhino Print Management holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Stahl Packaging Coatings nor Rhino Print Management holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Stahl Packaging Coatings nor Rhino Print Management holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Stahl Packaging Coatings nor Rhino Print Management holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Stahl Packaging Coatings nor Rhino Print Management holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References