Comparison Overview

iConcept Press

VS

The L Magazine

iConcept Press

Unit E1, 4/F, Gee Change Industrial Building, Hong Kong, HK
Last Update: 2025-11-21
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.iconceptpress.com

iConcept Press is a multidisciplinary publishing company who helps academics make their work visible and accessible to diverse audiences around the world. Company Overview iConcept Press is a multidisciplinary publishing company established in January 2010. We help leading academics make their work visible and accessible to diverse new audiences around the world. Our goals are as follows: - To open the door to the world's library of scientific knowledge by giving people anywhere in the world access to the latest scientific research - To facilitate research and education by making it possible to search the full text of every article in our book, regular journal, pocket journal, and certain lecture notes for free - To enable scientists, researchers, librarians, publishers, and entrepreneurs to develop innovative ways to explore and use the world's treasury of scientific ideas and discoveries

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

The L Magazine

US
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 800 and 849
http://thelmagazine.com

The L Magazine is dedicated to uncovering emerging culture in Brooklyn and the rest of NYC. Music and art, film and food, news and neighborhoods... from rooftop gardens in Bushwick to empanada carts in Red Hook; from DIY rock shows in Williamsburg to nightlife tastemakers in downtown clubs, lives in New York. If it’s new, we will find it; if it’s good, we will tell you about it. Our freely distributed publication is a vital resource for: Event recommendations Cultural trendspotting Local neighborhood reporting

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/iconcept-press.jpeg
iConcept Press
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
The L Magazine
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
iConcept Press
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The L Magazine
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for iConcept Press in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The L Magazine in 2025.

Incident History — iConcept Press (X = Date, Y = Severity)

iConcept Press cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The L Magazine (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The L Magazine cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/iconcept-press.jpeg
iConcept Press
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
The L Magazine
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The L Magazine company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to iConcept Press company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The L Magazine company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to iConcept Press company.

In the current year, The L Magazine company and iConcept Press company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The L Magazine company nor iConcept Press company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The L Magazine company nor iConcept Press company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The L Magazine company nor iConcept Press company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither iConcept Press company nor The L Magazine company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither iConcept Press nor The L Magazine holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither iConcept Press company nor The L Magazine company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The L Magazine company employs more people globally than iConcept Press company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither iConcept Press nor The L Magazine holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither iConcept Press nor The L Magazine holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither iConcept Press nor The L Magazine holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither iConcept Press nor The L Magazine holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither iConcept Press nor The L Magazine holds HIPAA certification.

Neither iConcept Press nor The L Magazine holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References