Comparison Overview

ICOMOS-UK

VS

Wing Haven

ICOMOS-UK

Cowcross Street, London, England, undefined, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

ICOMOS-UK is the UK National Committee of ICOMOS (International Council on Monuments and Sites). At an international level, ICOMOS develops best practice in the conservation and management of cultural sites, and has a special role as adviser to the UNESCO World Heritage Committee on cultural World Heritage sites. Active in over 130 countries, it is one of the most highly regarded conservation organisations in the world.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Wing Haven

260 Ridgewood Avenue, Charlotte, North Carolina, 28209, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23

Located in the heart of Charlotte, North Carolina, Wing Haven provides a natural oasis for reflection and study of its three public gardens. Wing Haven Garden & Bird Sanctuary is rich in Southern horticulture and a habitat for birds and wildlife. The Elizabeth Lawrence House & Garden is the site of a world-renowned garden writer’s living laboratory. The new SEED Wildlife & Children’s Gardens provide hands-on exploratory learning and a natural habitat for local wildlife. Together, these properties welcome visitors of all ages to discover and learn. Wing Haven offers more than 40 programs and special events each year. Wing Haven organizes outreach to at-risk preschool children through our PEEPs initiative.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/icomos-uk.jpeg
ICOMOS-UK
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wing-haven.jpeg
Wing Haven
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ICOMOS-UK
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Wing Haven
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ICOMOS-UK in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wing Haven in 2026.

Incident History — ICOMOS-UK (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ICOMOS-UK cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Wing Haven (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wing Haven cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/icomos-uk.jpeg
ICOMOS-UK
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wing-haven.jpeg
Wing Haven
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Wing Haven company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to ICOMOS-UK company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Wing Haven company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to ICOMOS-UK company.

In the current year, Wing Haven company and ICOMOS-UK company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Wing Haven company nor ICOMOS-UK company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Wing Haven company nor ICOMOS-UK company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Wing Haven company nor ICOMOS-UK company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ICOMOS-UK company nor Wing Haven company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ICOMOS-UK nor Wing Haven holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither ICOMOS-UK company nor Wing Haven company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Wing Haven company employs more people globally than ICOMOS-UK company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither ICOMOS-UK nor Wing Haven holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ICOMOS-UK nor Wing Haven holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ICOMOS-UK nor Wing Haven holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ICOMOS-UK nor Wing Haven holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ICOMOS-UK nor Wing Haven holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ICOMOS-UK nor Wing Haven holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H