Comparison Overview

ICL Imaging

VS

Quality Labels

ICL Imaging

51 Mellen St, Framingham, MA, US, 01702
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.icl-imaging.com

We are a full-service, large format printer and a recognized leader in the field of full color, large format printing and finishing. Our Large Format Printing services include Graphics for: Trade Shows, Corporations, Retailers, Advertising, Museums, Events, Vehicles, Designers, and Architects. We produce Backlit Graphics, Lobby Signage, Fabric Banners, Movie Set Backdrops, Outdoor Signage, Portable Displays, Retail Graphics, Retractable Banner-stands, Vinyl Banners, Custom Wall Coverings, Adhesive Vinyls, Cut Vinyl Letters, Window Clings, Frosted Vinyl, Building Wraps, Construction Barricades, Bus Shelters, and Installations. Our services include; Leading Retailers, Exhibit Builders and Event Planners, Design Firms, Corporations, TV and Radio Stations, Museums, Cruise Ship Lines, and Advertising Agencies.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 39
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Quality Labels

IE, 01
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799
http://www.quality-labels.com

Since its establishment in 1990 Quality Labels has gone from strength to strength. The company is 100% Irish owned and operated and is committed to continual re-investment in the business and this is evident from its very modest beginnings as a label printing company with one 3 colour printing press and a very basic rewinding machine, operating from a small factory, to now being one of the largest label companies in the country with multiple manufacturing sites and an extensive list of machinery with a total of 7 printing presses ranging from 3 colours up to 8 colours, 5 blank label presses, and 7 rewinding machines operating from four modern production facilities located in the greater Dublin area. We are not only committed to investment in the best of machinery but also in our staff. All of our staff are highly trained, experienced and vocational people. This philosophy of continual reinvestment has us at the forefront of the label industry and allows us to expand year on year. We understand that labelling is a small part of a person's business but it is also a critical part and for this reason all our customers receive the same level of respect, service and quality no matter what size of company they are and our customers range from small cottage industries to large multi-national blue chip companies. For further information please feel free to contact us at any stage. Ph: +353(0)14019018

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/icl-imaging.jpeg
ICL Imaging
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/quality-labels.jpeg
Quality Labels
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ICL Imaging
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Quality Labels
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ICL Imaging in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Quality Labels in 2025.

Incident History — ICL Imaging (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ICL Imaging cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Quality Labels (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Quality Labels cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/icl-imaging.jpeg
ICL Imaging
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/quality-labels.jpeg
Quality Labels
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both ICL Imaging company and Quality Labels company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Quality Labels company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to ICL Imaging company.

In the current year, Quality Labels company and ICL Imaging company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Quality Labels company nor ICL Imaging company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Quality Labels company nor ICL Imaging company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Quality Labels company nor ICL Imaging company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ICL Imaging company nor Quality Labels company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ICL Imaging nor Quality Labels holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither ICL Imaging company nor Quality Labels company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

ICL Imaging company employs more people globally than Quality Labels company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither ICL Imaging nor Quality Labels holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ICL Imaging nor Quality Labels holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ICL Imaging nor Quality Labels holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ICL Imaging nor Quality Labels holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ICL Imaging nor Quality Labels holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ICL Imaging nor Quality Labels holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References