Comparison Overview

ICICI Bank

VS

Bank Alfalah Limited

ICICI Bank

ICICI Bank Towers, Bandra-Kurla Complex, Mumbai , Maharashtra, 400 051, IN
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 800 and 849

ICICI Bank is one of India’s leading private sector banks, offering a wide range of banking products and services to corporate, Small and Medium Enterprises (SME) and individual customers across the country. The Bank offers multi-channel touch points including branches, ATMs, mobile banking, internet banking, and phone banking. The Bank has a network of 6,742 branches and 16,277 ATMs and cash recycling machines across India, as at December 31, 2024. For any assistance on products and services, please call ICICI Bank’s customer care number 1800 1080. Disclaimer: The content herein is only for information and does not amount to an offer, invitation or solicitation to buy or sell, and is not intended to create any rights or obligations. It is also not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person in any jurisdiction where such distribution or use would be contrary to law or would subject ICICI Bank Limited (“ICICI Bank”) or its affiliate(s) to any licensing or registration requirements. Nothing contained herein is intended to constitute advice or opinion; please obtain professional advice before relying on any information contained herein. ICICI Bank disclaims any liability with respect to accuracy of information or any error or omission or any loss or damage incurred by anyone in reliance on the contents herein.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 164,277
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Bank Alfalah Limited

B.A. Building, I I Chundrigar Road, Karachi, Sindh, undefined, PK
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Bank Alfalah is one of the largest private Banks in Pakistan with a network of over 1100 branches in more than 200 cities across Pakistan with an international presence in Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bahrain, and a representative office in the UAE. The Bank is owned and operated by the Abu Dhabi Group. The International Finance Corporation (IFC) of the World Bank partnered with the Bank in 2014 and holds a 15 percent stake in Bank Alfalah. Incorporated as a public limited company on 21st June 1992, under the Companies Ordinance, 1984, Bank Alfalah commenced banking operations from 1st November 1997. The Bank provides financial solutions to consumers, corporations, institutions, and governments through a broad spectrum of products and services, including corporate and investment banking, consumer banking and credit, securities brokerage, commercial, SME, agri-finance, Islamic and asset financing. JCR-VIS has assigned an entity rating of ‘AA+’ (double-A plus) for the long-term and ‘A1+’ (One plus) for the short-term, with a stable outlook. PACRA has assigned Bank Alfalah ‘AA+’ (double-A plus) entity rating for the long-term and ‘A1+’ (One plus) for the short-term, with a positive outlook. The Bank is listed on the Pakistan Stock Exchange.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 14,583
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/icici-bank.jpeg
ICICI Bank
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bank-alfalah-limited.jpeg
Bank Alfalah Limited
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ICICI Bank
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bank Alfalah Limited
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ICICI Bank in 2025.

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bank Alfalah Limited in 2025.

Incident History — ICICI Bank (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ICICI Bank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bank Alfalah Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bank Alfalah Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/icici-bank.jpeg
ICICI Bank
Incidents

Date Detected: 04/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2016
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: ATM Network Processing
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bank-alfalah-limited.jpeg
Bank Alfalah Limited
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

ICICI Bank company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Bank Alfalah Limited company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

ICICI Bank company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Bank Alfalah Limited company has not reported any.

In the current year, Bank Alfalah Limited company and ICICI Bank company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Bank Alfalah Limited company nor ICICI Bank company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

ICICI Bank company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Bank Alfalah Limited company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Bank Alfalah Limited company nor ICICI Bank company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ICICI Bank company nor Bank Alfalah Limited company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ICICI Bank nor Bank Alfalah Limited holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither ICICI Bank company nor Bank Alfalah Limited company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

ICICI Bank company employs more people globally than Bank Alfalah Limited company, reflecting its scale as a Banking.

Neither ICICI Bank nor Bank Alfalah Limited holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ICICI Bank nor Bank Alfalah Limited holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ICICI Bank nor Bank Alfalah Limited holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ICICI Bank nor Bank Alfalah Limited holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ICICI Bank nor Bank Alfalah Limited holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ICICI Bank nor Bank Alfalah Limited holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H