Comparison Overview

ICESA

VS

Tangram Interiors

ICESA

08192, ES
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 800 and 849

ICESA (1985) se dedica a la fabricación de todo tipo de mobiliario a medida, abarcando cualquier singularidad que pueda tener un proyecto, tanto en cuestión constructiva como en acabados de todo tipo de materiales. Disponer de operarios cualificados y tecnología avanzada hace posible adaptarnos a las necesidades de cada trabajo, en diseño, acabados y plazos de entrega. Solemos enfocar nuestro mercado en locales comerciales o particulares pero nuestra versatilidad nos permite hacer tambien desde maquetas o estructuras hasta pequeñas cadenas.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 107
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Tangram Interiors

9200 Sorensen Avenue, Santa Fe Springs, CA, 90670, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25

Tangram Interiors collaborates with clients as a creative partner to create and manage interior environments that enhance the client’s brand and culture through the expert integration of technology, furniture, flooring, and service solutions. Our team is dedicated to developing unique solutions that deliver results. -We believe space is one of the means of defining a company’s culture. -Our solutions play a role in setting the stage to encourage desired behaviors (collaboration, communication socializing). -We team up with our clients and partners to develop concepts that unlock the potential of organizations and their people. ___________________________________ Follow us! Instagram: @tangraminteriors / Twitter: @tangramtweets / Facebook: Facebook.com/yourofficeinspired

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 304
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/icesa.jpeg
ICESA
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tangram-interiors.jpeg
Tangram Interiors
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ICESA
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Tangram Interiors
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ICESA in 2025.

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tangram Interiors in 2025.

Incident History — ICESA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ICESA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Tangram Interiors (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tangram Interiors cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/icesa.jpeg
ICESA
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tangram-interiors.jpeg
Tangram Interiors
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

ICESA company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Tangram Interiors company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Tangram Interiors company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to ICESA company.

In the current year, Tangram Interiors company and ICESA company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Tangram Interiors company nor ICESA company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Tangram Interiors company nor ICESA company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Tangram Interiors company nor ICESA company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ICESA company nor Tangram Interiors company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ICESA nor Tangram Interiors holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither ICESA company nor Tangram Interiors company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Tangram Interiors company employs more people globally than ICESA company, reflecting its scale as a Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing.

Neither ICESA nor Tangram Interiors holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ICESA nor Tangram Interiors holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ICESA nor Tangram Interiors holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ICESA nor Tangram Interiors holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ICESA nor Tangram Interiors holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ICESA nor Tangram Interiors holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.