Comparison Overview

ICD Publications, Inc.

VS

MIT Sloan Management Review

ICD Publications, Inc.

1377 Motor Pkwy, Islandia, 11749, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.icdnet.com

ICD Publications is an independent business-to-business media company with industry-leading print and digital platforms covering the U.S. retail housewares and hospitality markets. ICD Publications operates HomeWorld Business and Gourmet Insider for the U.S. retail housewares market; and Hotel Business and InspireDesign for the hospitality market. Founded in 1989, ICD has offices Islandia (Long Island), NY, and Lincolnshire, IL, near Chicago. ICD’s market-leading media platforms are noted for their comprehensive industry news coverage, in-depth business trend analysis, insightful executive profiles and exclusive market data.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

MIT Sloan Management Review

One Main Street, Cambridge, MA, 02142, US
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799
http://sloanreview.mit.edu/

At MIT Sloan Management Review (MIT SMR), we explore how leadership and management are transforming in a disruptive world. We help thoughtful leaders capture the exciting opportunities—and face down the challenges—created as technological, societal, and environmental forces reshape how organizations operate, compete, and create value. We encourage comments, questions, and suggestions. We respect and appreciate our audience's point of view; however, we reserve the right to remove or turn off comments at our moderator’s discretion. Comments that violate our guidelines (see below) or use language that MIT SMR staff regard as abusive, attacking, offensive, vulgar, or of a bullying nature will be immediately removed. Repeat offenders may be blocked indefinitely. MIT Sloan Management Review’s LinkedIn Commenting Guidelines: 1. Respect. Debates are great, but attacks are not. Any comment that creates a hostile environment will be removed. 2. Hate speech. Comments containing bullying, racism, homophobia, sexism, or any other form of hate speech will be removed. 3. Language. Vulgar posts may offend other readers and will be removed. 4. Personal information. Any comment with personal information (address, phone number, etc.) will be removed.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 79
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/icd-publications-inc-.jpeg
ICD Publications, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mit-sloan-management-review.jpeg
MIT Sloan Management Review
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ICD Publications, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
MIT Sloan Management Review
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ICD Publications, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MIT Sloan Management Review in 2025.

Incident History — ICD Publications, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ICD Publications, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — MIT Sloan Management Review (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MIT Sloan Management Review cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/icd-publications-inc-.jpeg
ICD Publications, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mit-sloan-management-review.jpeg
MIT Sloan Management Review
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

MIT Sloan Management Review company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to ICD Publications, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, MIT Sloan Management Review company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to ICD Publications, Inc. company.

In the current year, MIT Sloan Management Review company and ICD Publications, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither MIT Sloan Management Review company nor ICD Publications, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither MIT Sloan Management Review company nor ICD Publications, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither MIT Sloan Management Review company nor ICD Publications, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ICD Publications, Inc. company nor MIT Sloan Management Review company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ICD Publications, Inc. nor MIT Sloan Management Review holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

MIT Sloan Management Review company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to ICD Publications, Inc. company.

MIT Sloan Management Review company employs more people globally than ICD Publications, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither ICD Publications, Inc. nor MIT Sloan Management Review holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ICD Publications, Inc. nor MIT Sloan Management Review holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ICD Publications, Inc. nor MIT Sloan Management Review holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ICD Publications, Inc. nor MIT Sloan Management Review holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ICD Publications, Inc. nor MIT Sloan Management Review holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ICD Publications, Inc. nor MIT Sloan Management Review holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References