Comparison Overview

ICA Gruppen

VS

Bunnings

ICA Gruppen

Kolonnvägen 20 , Solna, A, SE, 17193
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.icagruppen.se/

ICA Gruppen´s core business is retail. The Group includes ICA Sweden which mainly conduct grocery retail, ICA Real Estate which owns and manages properties, ICA Bank which offers financial services and insurances, Apotek Hjärtat which conducts pharmacy operations. Guidelines: Comments in our channels that are offensive or abusive in nature will be removed.

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 11,318
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Bunnings

570 Swan Street, Burnley, Victoria, 3121, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bunnings.com.au

We are the leading retailer of home improvement and outdoor living products in Australia & New Zealand and a major supplier to project builders, commercial tradespeople and the housing industry. Our ambition is to provide our customers with the widest range of home improvement products in accordance with our lowest prices policy, backed with the best service. Our social media community standards can be found here: https://www.bunnings.com.au/policies/community-standards

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 15,633
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ica.jpeg
ICA Gruppen
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bunnings.jpeg
Bunnings
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ICA Gruppen
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bunnings
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ICA Gruppen in 2025.

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bunnings in 2025.

Incident History — ICA Gruppen (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ICA Gruppen cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bunnings (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bunnings cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ica.jpeg
ICA Gruppen
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bunnings.jpeg
Bunnings
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Bunnings company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to ICA Gruppen company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Bunnings company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to ICA Gruppen company.

In the current year, Bunnings company and ICA Gruppen company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Bunnings company nor ICA Gruppen company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Bunnings company nor ICA Gruppen company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Bunnings company nor ICA Gruppen company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ICA Gruppen company nor Bunnings company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ICA Gruppen nor Bunnings holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

ICA Gruppen company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Bunnings company.

Bunnings company employs more people globally than ICA Gruppen company, reflecting its scale as a Retail.

Neither ICA Gruppen nor Bunnings holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ICA Gruppen nor Bunnings holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ICA Gruppen nor Bunnings holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ICA Gruppen nor Bunnings holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ICA Gruppen nor Bunnings holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ICA Gruppen nor Bunnings holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References