Comparison Overview

ICA Gruppen

VS

Boots UK

ICA Gruppen

Kolonnvägen 20 , Solna, A, SE, 17193
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.icagruppen.se/

ICA Gruppen´s core business is retail. The Group includes ICA Sweden which mainly conduct grocery retail, ICA Real Estate which owns and manages properties, ICA Bank which offers financial services and insurances, Apotek Hjärtat which conducts pharmacy operations. Guidelines: Comments in our channels that are offensive or abusive in nature will be removed.

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 11,318
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Boots UK

1 Thane Road, Nottingham, GB, NG90 1BS
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 700 and 749
http://www.boots.jobs

Boots is the UK’s leading health and beauty retailer with over 52,000 team members and around 1,800 stores,* ranging from local community pharmacies to large destination health and beauty stores. We serve our customers and patients’ wellbeing for life as the leading provider of healthcare on the high street and the UK’s number one beauty destination. We have an unrivalled depth and breadth of product offering, which incorporates our extensive own brand range and innovative portfolio of brands, including No7, the UK’s No1 skincare brand, Soap & Glory, Liz Earle Beauty and Sleek MakeUP. For over 175 years, we have listened, learned and innovated, and continue to challenge ourselves to improve our products and services every day. *Figures accurate as of 17 July 2025

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 26,138
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ica.jpeg
ICA Gruppen
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/boots.jpeg
Boots UK
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ICA Gruppen
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Boots UK
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ICA Gruppen in 2025.

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Boots UK in 2025.

Incident History — ICA Gruppen (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ICA Gruppen cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Boots UK (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Boots UK cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ica.jpeg
ICA Gruppen
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/boots.jpeg
Boots UK
Incidents

Date Detected: 06/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: SQL Injection
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 03/2020
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Account Compromise
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

FAQ

ICA Gruppen company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Boots UK company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Boots UK company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas ICA Gruppen company has not reported any.

In the current year, Boots UK company and ICA Gruppen company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Boots UK company nor ICA Gruppen company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Boots UK company has disclosed at least one data breach, while ICA Gruppen company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Boots UK company nor ICA Gruppen company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ICA Gruppen company nor Boots UK company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ICA Gruppen nor Boots UK holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

ICA Gruppen company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Boots UK company.

Boots UK company employs more people globally than ICA Gruppen company, reflecting its scale as a Retail.

Neither ICA Gruppen nor Boots UK holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ICA Gruppen nor Boots UK holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ICA Gruppen nor Boots UK holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ICA Gruppen nor Boots UK holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ICA Gruppen nor Boots UK holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ICA Gruppen nor Boots UK holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References