Comparison Overview

Iberia Express

VS

Alaska Airlines

Iberia Express

C/ Alcañiz, 23, Madrid, 28042, ES
Last Update: 2025-11-26

We are part of the Iberia Group, the leading low-cost airline at Madrid airport and on routes to the Canary and Balearic Islands. Our hybrid “low cost, high quality” business model combines great efficiency with a customer experience that includes connecting flights and Business Class service. In 2024, we were the world’s most punctual low-cost airline and the most punctual airline in Europe, according to consultancy firm Cirium. We operate a highly efficient fleet of 25 aircraft, which will help us meet our commitment to net zero emissions by 2050. The Iberia Express team is made up of more than 900 employees who share and promote the values of teamwork, warmth, and kindness, which are the core of our company’s DNA, as well as diversity in all areas.

NAICS: 481
NAICS Definition: Air Transportation
Employees: 637
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
5
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
2

Alaska Airlines

19300 International Blvd, None, Seattle, Washington, US, 98188
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

We’re creating an airline people love. It begins with each Alaska Airlines employee, bringing unique strengths and energy to our work in the air and on the ground. Every day, we go beyond what’s expected and reach for the remarkable, together. Welcome to our LinkedIn page. We like conversations on our page, but comments that contain profanity, hate speech, spam or are otherwise offensive will be removed. Out of respect for our employees'​ privacy, we reserve the right to hide or remove any post or comment that is disparaging or has negative intent towards our employees. Our Social Care Team is here for you 24/7. If you require assistance or need an official response, please contact us at http://bit.ly/ContactAK.

NAICS: 481
NAICS Definition: Air Transportation
Employees: 12,819
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/iberia-express.jpeg
Iberia Express
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alaska-airlines.jpeg
Alaska Airlines
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Iberia Express
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Alaska Airlines
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Average (This Year)

Iberia Express has 1036.36% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Alaska Airlines in 2025.

Incident History — Iberia Express (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Iberia Express cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Alaska Airlines (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Alaska Airlines cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/iberia-express.jpeg
Iberia Express
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Third-party software vulnerability (customer management system), Dark web extortion
Motivation: Financial gain (ransom extortion)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Third-Party Vendor Compromise, Misconfigured Cloud Storage (speculated), Inadequate Access Controls (speculated)
Motivation: Financial Gain (data sold for $150,000 on dark web)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Supply Chain Attack, Third-Party Vendor Exploitation
Motivation: Financial Gain, Data Theft for Resale
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alaska-airlines.jpeg
Alaska Airlines
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Alaska Airlines company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Iberia Express company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Iberia Express company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Alaska Airlines company has not reported any.

In the current year, Iberia Express company has reported more cyber incidents than Alaska Airlines company.

Neither Alaska Airlines company nor Iberia Express company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Iberia Express company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Alaska Airlines company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Iberia Express company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Alaska Airlines company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Iberia Express company nor Alaska Airlines company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Iberia Express nor Alaska Airlines holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Alaska Airlines company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Iberia Express company.

Alaska Airlines company employs more people globally than Iberia Express company, reflecting its scale as a Airlines and Aviation.

Neither Iberia Express nor Alaska Airlines holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Iberia Express nor Alaska Airlines holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Iberia Express nor Alaska Airlines holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Iberia Express nor Alaska Airlines holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Iberia Express nor Alaska Airlines holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Iberia Express nor Alaska Airlines holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H