Comparison Overview

IACSA

VS

Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget

IACSA

4058, CH
Last Update: 2025-12-02
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.iacsa.ch

The International Association for Cultural Studies in Architecture (IACSA) is an association according to Art. 60 ff. of the Swiss Civil Code. The mission of the association consists in non-profit activities: 1. in the promotion of scientific, artistic and constructional approaches to the cultural and social appropriation of the built environment, and 2. the creation of an international network of people active in this thematic field.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 33
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget

1900 M Street, NW, Suite 850, Washington, DC, US, 20036
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799
http://crfb.org/

The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget is a bipartisan, non-profit organization committed to educating the public about issues that have significant fiscal policy impact. The Committee is made up of some of the nation's leading budget experts including many of the past Chairmen and Directors of the Budget Committees, the Congressional Budget Office, the Office of Management and Budget, the Government Accountability Office, and the Federal Reserve Board. Like us on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/BudgetHawks Follow us on Twitter (@BudgetHawks) https://twitter.com/#!/BudgetHawks

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 41
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/iacsa.jpeg
IACSA
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/committee-for-a-responsible-federal-budget.jpeg
Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
IACSA
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IACSA in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget in 2025.

Incident History — IACSA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IACSA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/iacsa.jpeg
IACSA
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/committee-for-a-responsible-federal-budget.jpeg
Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

IACSA company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to IACSA company.

In the current year, Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget company and IACSA company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget company nor IACSA company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget company nor IACSA company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget company nor IACSA company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither IACSA company nor Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither IACSA nor Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither IACSA company nor Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget company employs more people globally than IACSA company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither IACSA nor Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither IACSA nor Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither IACSA nor Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither IACSA nor Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither IACSA nor Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget holds HIPAA certification.

Neither IACSA nor Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
References
Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
References
Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References