Comparison Overview

IABG

VS

Center for Global Development

IABG

Einsteinstraße 20, Ottobrunn, DE, 85521
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

IABG was founded in 1961 as a central analysis and testing organisation for the aerospace industry and the Ministry of Defence as part of an initiative by the German government. Today, IABG is a leading European technology and science service provider. We employ about 1,000 highly qualified employees at 16 locations in Germany and the EU. The service spectrum of IABG covers analytical, technical and operational solutions in the following sectors: •Automotive •InfoCom •Mobility, Energy & Environment •Aeronautics •Space •Defence & Security IABG was privatised in 1993 and is now managed by its owners. We are independent of commercial affiliation, hardware-neutral and exclusively represent the interests of our customers, who include national and international companies as well as the public sector. For over 50 years we have followed the life cycles of technical systems, in particular the development, qualification and operational phases. In so doing, we make use of the synergies arising from the combination of the various competencies within the company.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 591
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Center for Global Development

2055 L Street NW, Washington, D.C., 20036, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

Over the past two decades, the Center for Global Development has maintained an unwavering focus on providing independent non-partisan research that has driven major changes in global development policy and practice. Our staff, located in Washington, D.C. and London, are our most valuable asset in achieving our mission to reduce global poverty and inequality. CGD seeks highly qualified and deeply dedicated colleagues to further our research and program goals, communications and outreach efforts, as well as to support organizational operations. We are committed to transparency, diversity, and professional and personal integrity. We value mutual respect, a collegial work place, and a healthy sense of humor.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 215
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/iabg.jpeg
IABG
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-for-global-development.jpeg
Center for Global Development
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
IABG
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Center for Global Development
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IABG in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Center for Global Development in 2025.

Incident History — IABG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IABG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Center for Global Development (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Center for Global Development cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/iabg.jpeg
IABG
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-for-global-development.jpeg
Center for Global Development
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both IABG company and Center for Global Development company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Center for Global Development company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to IABG company.

In the current year, Center for Global Development company and IABG company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Center for Global Development company nor IABG company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Center for Global Development company nor IABG company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Center for Global Development company nor IABG company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither IABG company nor Center for Global Development company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither IABG nor Center for Global Development holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither IABG company nor Center for Global Development company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

IABG company employs more people globally than Center for Global Development company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither IABG nor Center for Global Development holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither IABG nor Center for Global Development holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither IABG nor Center for Global Development holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither IABG nor Center for Global Development holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither IABG nor Center for Global Development holds HIPAA certification.

Neither IABG nor Center for Global Development holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X