Comparison Overview

i4 Automation Ltd

VS

Panagon Systems

i4 Automation Ltd

GB
Last Update: 2025-11-21

i4 Automation are all about finding good technical solutions for your automation applications that offer great value for money and future proofing with established leading edge technology. Our aim is to make your automated process work as efficiently as possible using cutting edge technology to give you full control and reporting at your finger tips. Which in turn will give you the competitive advantage you need. We do this by having extensive experience with automation and control and more importantly understanding your control needs.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Panagon Systems

51375 Regency Center Drive, Macomb, MI, 48042, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26

PANAGON SYSTEMS, based in Macomb Michigan USA, is the largest aftermarket hydraulic piston pump and parts manufacturer in the North America, providing the largest variety of current and obsolete components. Most hydraulic suppliers import their parts for resale, having no control over quality and with no knowledge of the manufacturing process. Panagon is different with the ability to produce a product from the raw materials to a finished pump, assembled, tested, painted, and shipped from our facility, thus making our operation different from all others in the aftermarket industry. Manufacturing companies like PANAGON SYSTEMS are needed in the industry because the original product manufacturers from time to time phase out certain product lines based on application needs, customer demands and just a general need to keep pace with the worldwide competition on product variety. When they do that, there remains a huge amount of machines and equipment still in operation with these phased out hydraulic products which need to be serviced for many years to come. Most of the OEM manufacturers can support a breakdown situation thru their distributor network for current production product lines, but due to phasing out of old products, the customer soon finds out the parts are not available or if they are, the delivery time could be months or the cost is high because of manufacturing out of the normal production schedule. Under those circumstances the customers are required to look at other suppliers like PANAGON SYSTEMS for the replacement parts. PANAGON SYSTEMS attempts to fill the void OEM’s create by manufacturing the phased out, expensive, unavailable pumps, motors and transmissions, from companies like Vickers, Denison, Rexroth etc.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/i4-automation-ltd.jpeg
i4 Automation Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/panagon-systems.jpeg
Panagon Systems
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
i4 Automation Ltd
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Panagon Systems
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for i4 Automation Ltd in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Panagon Systems in 2025.

Incident History — i4 Automation Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

i4 Automation Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Panagon Systems (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Panagon Systems cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/i4-automation-ltd.jpeg
i4 Automation Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/panagon-systems.jpeg
Panagon Systems
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Panagon Systems company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to i4 Automation Ltd company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Panagon Systems company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to i4 Automation Ltd company.

In the current year, Panagon Systems company and i4 Automation Ltd company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Panagon Systems company nor i4 Automation Ltd company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Panagon Systems company nor i4 Automation Ltd company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Panagon Systems company nor i4 Automation Ltd company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither i4 Automation Ltd company nor Panagon Systems company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither i4 Automation Ltd nor Panagon Systems holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither i4 Automation Ltd company nor Panagon Systems company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Panagon Systems company employs more people globally than i4 Automation Ltd company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither i4 Automation Ltd nor Panagon Systems holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither i4 Automation Ltd nor Panagon Systems holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither i4 Automation Ltd nor Panagon Systems holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither i4 Automation Ltd nor Panagon Systems holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither i4 Automation Ltd nor Panagon Systems holds HIPAA certification.

Neither i4 Automation Ltd nor Panagon Systems holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H